forensic files is the RDI poster a troll, bully or lynch mob? forumsforjustice rebuttal

this is trasha griffith


trasha pictured below is an example of an anti-science denialist



this is what she claims

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?76520-Patsy-Ramsey/page92

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

As owner, I do my best to stay out of actual discussions about a crime.

The JBR case is the one expection.

Websleuths is a leader in true crime information as well as discussion. People come here to get information. It is imperative we deal with the facts. Not fantasy.

All I ask for are facts and a logical connecting of the dots. Logic and facts.

When I get time I will be going through the forum to make sure the JonBenet Ramsey forum is being held up to the high standards just like all our other forums on Websleuths.

The days of allowing anyone to post anything because it's part of their "theory" are gone. Facts and logic. Very simple.

this is her qualifications

Host Tricia Griffith is a veteran radio disc jockey and owner of Websleuths.com and owner of Forums for Justice.org.

in other words she has ZERO qualifications in forensic science. she has no training in forensic fiber, trace evidence, DNA yet she claims

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

there are plenty of trolls on the web. plenty of bullies on the web. and of course there are lynch mobs.

there are plenty of psychopaths in this world, plenty of people who indulge in bullying and lynch mob behaviors. since the so-called majority believe in RDI, that makes the Ramseys vulnerable to this sort of harassment.

so if you see a RDI poster, one obvious question is whether they are any of the above.

one simple screening

do they have a background in forensic science, or have they ever studied any textbooks on foresnics, esp crime scene reconstruction



here is a summary

Crime reconstruction or crime scene reconstruction is the forensic science discipline in which one gains "explicit knowledge of the series of events that surround the commission of a crime using deductive and inductive reasoning, physical evidence, scientific methods, and their interrelationships."

when you hear RDI denialists claim there's not a scintilla of evidence for an intruder
are they using standard textbook science that is used to successfully solve other forensic crimes, in the
JonBenet Ramsey case.

i promise no RDI has. therefore, since they have no background in science, esp forensic science, nor have studied any textbooks on forensic crime scene reconstruction, they are all troll, bully or lynch mob