JonBenet Ramsey and other cases involving intruders, same scientific forensic standards
The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey :: The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey-BLOGS :: Redpill's Blog
Page 1 of 1
JonBenet Ramsey and other cases involving intruders, same scientific forensic standards
modern science of forensics is, first and foremost, a science. it uses scientific methodology, scientific research and scientific standards
a common RDI inspired claim is this
consider
trasha pictured below is an example of an anti-science denialist
this is what she claims
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?76520-Patsy-Ramsey/page92
this is her qualifications
in other words she has ZERO qualifications in forensic science. she has no training in forensic fiber, trace evidence, DNA yet she claims
let's quickly review her qualification again
so Tricia Griffith has Zero qualifications in science.
now define what qualifies as evidence of the scientific forensic kind.
is fiber evidence of the scientific forensic evidence? is shoe print evidence scientific forensic evidence? dna scientific forensic evidence? is the tape and ligature, unsourced, scientific forensic evidence?
is RDI claims that an intruder would not leave a body and ransom note behind scientific forensic evidence? is RDI claims an intruder would not leave a ransom note on the stairs scientific forensic evidence?
would a professionally trained and qualified scientific forensic scientist say, well the fiber hair dna handwriting lingusitics shoe print ligature and tape say this establishes on scientific forensic grounds that an intruder murdered Jonbenet, but an intruder wouldn't leave a ransom note on the stairs, that's an illogical place to put it, an intruder would place it on the kitchen table and would carry the body out to collect on the ransom note, therefore no scintilla of evidence intruder ?
would a forensic scientist say well i think the parents did it bc burke was jealous of jonbenet and he hit her over the head to cover up abuse? it's patsy's handwriting after all.
or would a forensic scientist look at the fiber dna hair ligature tape, shoe print all unsourced and ask what is the simplest explanation that would explain this UNSOURCED evidence?
what makes fibers, shoe print, hair, dna scientific forensic evidence, tape and ligature, but leaving a ransom note and body behind not scientific forensic evidence?
now, there have been other crimes and cases involving intruders. the east area rapist is an intruder who entered homes. heather coffin was found raped and murdered in her own home. Mr cruel entered the homes of young girls.
there are many cases of both house burglars and robbers and rapists entering homes.
what scientific forensic evidence was found at these crimes scenes? what fiber, hair, dna, shoe print, items, etc? i.e were scientific forensic evidence
an alternative criteria is that there have been kidnapped and abducted victims, and the question is, is there scientific forensic evidence the victim was in the suspect's home or car.
what sort of scientific forensic evidence could establish the victim was in the suspect's home or car?
how this compare with intruder theory in Jonbenet case?
to give a concrete examples
what sort of scientific forensic evidence was found in the Bennett family murders?
how does it compare with Jonbenet?
what sort of scientific forensic evidence was found in the abudction of Eloise Worledge?
how does it compare with Jonbenet?
what sort of scientific forensic evidence was found in the murder of Heather Coffin?
how does it compare with Jonbenet?
what criteria do scientists use to evaluate hypothesis?
a common RDI inspired claim is this
consider
trasha pictured below is an example of an anti-science denialist
this is what she claims
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?76520-Patsy-Ramsey/page92
tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.
No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.
As owner, I do my best to stay out of actual discussions about a crime.
The JBR case is the one expection.
Websleuths is a leader in true crime information as well as discussion. People come here to get information. It is imperative we deal with the facts. Not fantasy.
All I ask for are facts and a logical connecting of the dots. Logic and facts.
When I get time I will be going through the forum to make sure the JonBenet Ramsey forum is being held up to the high standards just like all our other forums on Websleuths.
The days of allowing anyone to post anything because it's part of their "theory" are gone. Facts and logic. Very simple.
this is her qualifications
Host Tricia Griffith is a veteran radio disc jockey and owner of Websleuths.com and owner of Forums for Justice.org.
in other words she has ZERO qualifications in forensic science. she has no training in forensic fiber, trace evidence, DNA yet she claims
tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.
No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.
let's quickly review her qualification again
Host Tricia Griffith is a veteran radio disc jockey and owner of Websleuths.com and owner of Forums for Justice.org.
so Tricia Griffith has Zero qualifications in science.
now define what qualifies as evidence of the scientific forensic kind.
is fiber evidence of the scientific forensic evidence? is shoe print evidence scientific forensic evidence? dna scientific forensic evidence? is the tape and ligature, unsourced, scientific forensic evidence?
is RDI claims that an intruder would not leave a body and ransom note behind scientific forensic evidence? is RDI claims an intruder would not leave a ransom note on the stairs scientific forensic evidence?
would a professionally trained and qualified scientific forensic scientist say, well the fiber hair dna handwriting lingusitics shoe print ligature and tape say this establishes on scientific forensic grounds that an intruder murdered Jonbenet, but an intruder wouldn't leave a ransom note on the stairs, that's an illogical place to put it, an intruder would place it on the kitchen table and would carry the body out to collect on the ransom note, therefore no scintilla of evidence intruder ?
would a forensic scientist say well i think the parents did it bc burke was jealous of jonbenet and he hit her over the head to cover up abuse? it's patsy's handwriting after all.
or would a forensic scientist look at the fiber dna hair ligature tape, shoe print all unsourced and ask what is the simplest explanation that would explain this UNSOURCED evidence?
what makes fibers, shoe print, hair, dna scientific forensic evidence, tape and ligature, but leaving a ransom note and body behind not scientific forensic evidence?
now, there have been other crimes and cases involving intruders. the east area rapist is an intruder who entered homes. heather coffin was found raped and murdered in her own home. Mr cruel entered the homes of young girls.
there are many cases of both house burglars and robbers and rapists entering homes.
what scientific forensic evidence was found at these crimes scenes? what fiber, hair, dna, shoe print, items, etc? i.e were scientific forensic evidence
an alternative criteria is that there have been kidnapped and abducted victims, and the question is, is there scientific forensic evidence the victim was in the suspect's home or car.
what sort of scientific forensic evidence could establish the victim was in the suspect's home or car?
how this compare with intruder theory in Jonbenet case?
to give a concrete examples
what sort of scientific forensic evidence was found in the Bennett family murders?
how does it compare with Jonbenet?
what sort of scientific forensic evidence was found in the abudction of Eloise Worledge?
how does it compare with Jonbenet?
what sort of scientific forensic evidence was found in the murder of Heather Coffin?
how does it compare with Jonbenet?
what criteria do scientists use to evaluate hypothesis?
_________________
If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side
redpill- Posts : 6166
Join date : 2012-12-08
Similar topics
» JonBenet Ramsey, Nancy Titterton and scientific standards in forensics
» why forumsforjustice Delmar England is a total forensic fraud - cynic goodsouthernsense same scientific standards
» JonBenet Ramsey forumsforjustice are scientific frauds by forensic files
» Barbara Rowan 14 and JonBenet Ramsey scientific forensic evidence
» Why touch DNA is scientific forensic evidence of an intruder in JonBenet Ramsey 2
» why forumsforjustice Delmar England is a total forensic fraud - cynic goodsouthernsense same scientific standards
» JonBenet Ramsey forumsforjustice are scientific frauds by forensic files
» Barbara Rowan 14 and JonBenet Ramsey scientific forensic evidence
» Why touch DNA is scientific forensic evidence of an intruder in JonBenet Ramsey 2
The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey :: The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey-BLOGS :: Redpill's Blog
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|