no RDI on forumsforjustice or websleuth or reddit or topix has any actual forensic qualifications

View previous topic View next topic Go down

no RDI on forumsforjustice or websleuth or reddit or topix has any actual forensic qualifications

Post by redpill on Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:07 pm

Suspect trasha pictured below is an example of an anti-science denialist




Trasha's qualification is that she is a DJ a radio host, a position that requires no scientific or forensic training.

cynic on reddit is goodsouthernsense introduced me to delmar england.

delmar england is a total forensic fraud.

no RDI on forumsforjustice or websleuth or reddit or topix has any actual forensic qualifications or studied science.

in the case of Koldkase these are posters who is a bored housewife who decided to get in on the Jonbenet case,
she has no actual background in science, and no qualifications or studied science in any capacity.

you read opinions of posters on these who claim Ramsey did it, but none of them have any actual qualifications in forensic science.

buyer beware.

the posters there have never studied any forensic science, crime scene reconstruction, or forensic document examination. the real thing.

the height of Trasha griffith dishonesty is that on the one hand she posts the truth about the carnes decision, then she and her buddies continue to promote cina wong and her 242 similarities.

pure nonsense.



as for me i have studied science and i am presenting how actual forensic scientists arrive at their conclusions in my various posts.

_________________
If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side
avatar
redpill

Posts : 1695
Join date : 2012-12-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum