RDI vs IDI Where's the poison? A battle of the wits

on various forums from topix reddit websmear forumsforjackasses you see RDI propaganda. they call it "justice" for prosecutors to charge the Ramseys. A very small sliver fraction of posters are intruder theorists.

now SD, cynic-goodsouthersense- et al, are at their forums, websmear forumsforjackasses, and i'm here on this blog.

so we are at an impasse.

in that case I challenge them to a battle of wits, for princess Jonbenet.

smell but do not taste. what you smell is Iocane powder. it is tasteless orderless and one of the deadlier poisons.

I will pour a small amount into one wine glass of two glasses, and you have to decide if the poison is in RDI or IDI.

it ends when you decide and we both drink and who is right and who is dead.

So Where's the poison?

Iocane powder comes from Australia. And everyone knows Australia was entirely peopled by criminals. I am not a criminal.


Is the poison in the ramsey did it faction, or is it in the intruder faction.

Who is right? and who is dead.

one way to settle this is

Did Patsy or John Ramsey write the ransom note, or did an intruder?

RDI on forumsforjackasses and topix propose a methodology


one forumsforjustice poster is koldkase, who is also on websleuth and topix

this is her claim

koldkase wrote:
"Me, I can use my own eyes and I don't need no special training to see that Patsy wrote the note.

koldkase wrote:
"Patsy Ramsey wrote the note. Period. No question. No reasonable argument. All anyone who is objective has to do is compare her exemplars with the ransom note, not to mention the repeated, innumerable writings, statements, and interviews with the Ramseys which repeat excessively the language in the ransom note." -

koldkase is a house wife with zero scientific or forensic qualifications


similarly, on topix,

Capricorn wrote:
Patsy wrote that note; there's no denying it. Not only would anyone with a working pair of eyes see it, but the lying about the scale and the rest just prove the point. Yes, Patsy was the one and now inadvertently, AK drove the point home for me

Capricorn wrote:
Again, the naked eye is never obsolete or outdated.

All anyone has to do is look at the comparisons and graphology, shmaphology, the writing is the same, both in handwriting and linguistically. You don't even need an expert to state it; it's blatantly a match

For every expert who is wishy washy or "excludes" Patsy, you'll find another who will state it IS Patsy.

in what they call "justice" they propose that they can simply look at the ransom note and then Patsy's and say it is Patsy's.

Intruder theorists such as myself suggest that we use SCIENCE to determine who wrote the ransom note.

Science (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge")[1][2]:58 is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.[a]

Whether the theory or technique employed by the expert is generally accepted in the scientific community;
Whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication;
Whether it can be and has been tested;
Whether the known or potential rate of error is acceptable; and
Whether the research was conducted independent of the particular litigation or dependent on an intention to provide the proposed testimony.[4]

here's a test




RDI fail the test. their methodology fails.

RDI fails. RDI is poison.

since as an intruder theorist I use the Daubert Side of the Forensics and actual understanding of the ASTM 9 point handwriting scale,

8 out 9 on this 9 point scale and elimination using forensic linguistics provides strong scientific evidence an intruder wrote the ransom note.

Since science leads to the conclusion that an intruder wrote the ransom note,
allow the scientific evidence which points to an intruder

the poison is RDI. RDI laughs then falls dead.