"Scientific analysis of evidence" JonBenet Ramsey and Yhoana Arteaga

View previous topic View next topic Go down

"Scientific analysis of evidence" JonBenet Ramsey and Yhoana Arteaga

Post by redpill on Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:47 pm

in the news is the murder of Yhoana Arteaga

case background

Authorities in Nashville, Tennessee, say that weeks of dogged police work has led to the arrest of a 45-year-old man who allegedly murdered his 12-year-old neighbor last month moments after the girl texted her mother that someone was knocking at the door, PEOPLE confirms.

During a press conference Monday evening, the Metro Nashville Police Department announced that they had detained Roy Coons for allegedly “brutally killing” Yhoana Arteaga, who family members found strangled to death on Aug. 10.

According to investigators, Coons lives two doors down from the Arteaga family’s trailer in Goodlettsville. He is facing multiple criminal counts, including premeditated murder.

Detectives had identified him early on as a possible suspect, PEOPLE learns.

“The grand jury returned a multi-count indictment charging Coons with first-degree premediated murder, two counts of first-degree felony murder, attempted rape of a child, and especially aggravated burglary,” a statement from police reads.

“Scientific analysis of evidence” performed by both the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation and the Metro Nashville Police Department laboratories “led to the identification of Coons as the suspected murderer,” the statement continues.

http://people.com/crime/neighbor-allegedly-killed-tennessee-girl-yhoana-arteaga/

of particular interest to Jonbenet is this


He had been identified since the initial stages of the investigation as a possible suspect. DNA, among other "scientific analysis" of evidence by both MNPD and the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation led to Coons, MNPD Chief Steve Anderson said.

on forums when you read of cynic/goodsouthernsense promoting the nonsense of delmar england from forumsforjustice, or for example,


Suspect trasha pictured below is an example of an anti-science denialist



this is what she claims

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?76520-Patsy-Ramsey/page92
tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

As owner, I do my best to stay out of actual discussions about a crime.

The JBR case is the one expection.

Websleuths is a leader in true crime information as well as discussion. People come here to get information. It is imperative we deal with the facts. Not fantasy.

All I ask for are facts and a logical connecting of the dots. Logic and facts.

When I get time I will be going through the forum to make sure the JonBenet Ramsey forum is being held up to the high standards just like all our other forums on Websleuths.

The days of allowing anyone to post anything because it's part of their "theory" are gone. Facts and logic. Very simple.

this is her qualifications

Host Tricia Griffith is a veteran radio disc jockey and owner of Websleuths.com and owner of Forums for Justice.org.

in other words she has ZERO qualifications in forensic science. she has no training in forensic fiber, trace evidence, DNA yet she claims

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

again, does this statement reflect

"scientific analysis" of evidence

science is grounded in observation.

there have been crimes involved with an intruder.

in crimes involving intruders, what scientific forensic evidence is left at the crime scene?

how does this scientific forensic evidence is left at the crime scene that involves an intruder entering a home, compare with the scientific forensic evidence recovered in the Jonbenet Ramsey crime scene?


science is grounded in observation.

in other crimes involving intruders such as the EARS/ONS and Mr. Cruel, ligature and tape and fibers and shoe prints were recovered, unsourced to the home.

ligature and tape and fibers and shoe prints were recovered, unsourced to the home. was the forensic evidence left behind by intruder.

science is grounded in observation and science is objective standard

what is an objective standard that ligature and tape and fibers and shoe prints were recovered, unsourced to the home. was the forensic evidence left behind by intruder but not a "scintalla of evidence" in the Jonbenet case?

if there was another young girl found murdered in her home, let's call her heather coffin, and they recovered ligature and tape and fibers and shoe prints were recovered, unsourced to the home. would this be a scintlla of evidence of an intruder?


since Trasha and the thugs over at forumsforjackass have zero background in science, what you read from RDI opinions on forumsforjustice websmear topix reddit etc, esp when they claim patsy wrote the ransom note it's patsy's handwriting,

show a total lack of

"scientific analysis" of evidence


_________________
If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side
avatar
redpill

Posts : 1728
Join date : 2012-12-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum