How specific forumsforjustice.org posters like Koldkase lies and deceives the public re: JonBenet Ramsey

MurderMysteryReader wrote:The RDI were so disappointed that the Ramsey's weren't indicted, convicted, tried, and convicted of the crime they thought the Ramseys committed. That would have been their brand of justice for JonBenet.

you mean lynch mob

MurderMysteryReader wrote:True. The RDI's ignorance is showing.

forumsforjustice.org claims "act ethically this forum prosecutes"

forumsforjustice.org claims to seek justice for JonBenet Ramsey

yet not a single forumsforjustice.org poster has any understanding of the relevant forensics

one forumsforjustice.org poster is koldkase

koldkase
koldkase is offline FFJ Senior Member

Autopsy evidence of ONGOING SEXUAL ABUSE.....

http://www.forumsforjustice.org/forums/showthread.php?10255-Autopsy-evidence-of-ONGOING-SEXUAL-ABUSE

koldkase is forumsforjustice.org Senior Member

this is how koldkase is forumsforjustice.org Senior Member lies and deceives the public

this is her claim

koldkase wrote:
"Me, I can use my own eyes and I don't need no special training to see that Patsy wrote the note.

koldkase wrote:
"Patsy Ramsey wrote the note. Period. No question. No reasonable argument. All anyone who is objective has to do is compare her exemplars with the ransom note, not to mention the repeated, innumerable writings, statements, and interviews with the Ramseys which repeat excessively the language in the ransom note." -

so forumsforjustice.org Senior Member claims to promote justice for JonBenet Ramsey

she claims that in promoting justice for JonBenet Ramsey

koldkase wrote:
"Me, I can use my own eyes and I don't need no special training to see that Patsy wrote the note.

koldkase wrote:
"Patsy Ramsey wrote the note. Period. No question. No reasonable argument. All anyone who is objective has to do is compare her exemplars with the ransom note, not to mention the repeated, innumerable writings, statements, and interviews with the Ramseys which repeat excessively the language in the ransom note." -

she is representing to the public that all you have to do is look at Patsy's handwriting and determine Patsy wrote the ransom note.

forumsforjustice.org claims "act ethically this forum prosecutes"

is this ethical?

compare koldkase a forumsforjustice.org Senior Member


now this is a statement of justice and a canon of ethics by Brent Turvey

Brent Turvey wrote:
Maintain an attitude of professionalism and integrity.
Conduct all research in a generally accepted scientific manner.
Assign appropriate credit for the ideas of others that are used.
Treat all information (not in the public domain) from a client or agency in a confidential manner, unless specific permission to disseminate information is obtained.
Maintain an attitude of independence and impartiality in order to ensure an unbiased analysis and interpretation of the evidence.
Strive to avoid preconceived ideas or biases regarding potential suspects or offenders from influencing a final profile or crime analysis when appropriate.
Render opinions and conclusions strictly in accordance with the evidence in the case.
Not exaggerate, embellish, or otherwise misrepresent qualifications when testifying, or at any other time, in any form.
Testify in an honest, straightforward manner and refuse to extend their opinion beyond their field of competence, phrasing testimony in a manner intended to avoid misinterpretation of their opinion.
Not use a profile or crime analysis (the inference of Offender or Crime Scene Characteristics) for the purposes of suggesting the guilt or innocence of a particular individual for a particular crime.
Make efforts to inform the court of the nature and implications of pertinent evidence if reasonably assured that this information will not be disclosed in court.
Maintain the quality and standards of the professional community by reporting unethical conduct to the appropriate authorities or professional organizations. (Turvey 1999: 722)

with actual genuine scientific research



actual genuine scientific research proves

laypersons like koldkase engage in overmatching

they see a couple of similarities in 2 documents and confidently proclaim a match when in fact they were written by 2 different writers.

real handwriting experts ABFDE are able to correctly distinguish this at rates approaching 98%

koldkase is violating

Maintain an attitude of professionalism and integrity.
Conduct all research in a generally accepted scientific manner.

and

Maintain an attitude of independence and impartiality in order to ensure an unbiased analysis and interpretation of the evidence.
Strive to avoid preconceived ideas or biases regarding potential suspects or offenders from influencing a final profile or crime analysis when appropriate.
Render opinions and conclusions strictly in accordance with the evidence in the case.
Not exaggerate, embellish, or otherwise misrepresent qualifications when testifying, or at any other time, in any form.
Testify in an honest, straightforward manner and refuse to extend their opinion beyond their field of competence, phrasing testimony in a manner intended to avoid misinterpretation of their opinion.
Not use a profile or crime analysis (the inference of Offender or Crime Scene Characteristics) for the purposes of suggesting the guilt or innocence of a particular individual for a particular crime.
Make efforts to inform the court of the nature and implications of pertinent evidence if reasonably assured that this information will not be disclosed in court.
Maintain the quality and standards of the professional community by reporting unethical conduct to the appropriate authorities or professional organizations. (

Testify in an honest, straightforward manner and refuse to extend their opinion beyond their field of competence, phrasing testimony in a manner intended to avoid misinterpretation of their opinion.

ABFDE using scientific methods and scientific training have eliminated both John and Patsy Ramsey as the author of the ransom note by handwriting alone

forumsforjustice.org posters are not truthfully informing and educating the public as to the actual conclusions of the forensic document examiners. instead they are promoting lies

they are in violation of

Make efforts to inform the court of the nature and implications of pertinent evidence if reasonably assured that this information will not be disclosed in court.

forumsforjustice.org posters have never discussed the actual findings of the relevant forensic document examiner

Patsy is eliminated.