JonBenet Ramsey tabloid RDI "patsy wrote the ransom note" vs a scientific analysis of questioned documents

Thu Sep 13, 2018

there have been some recent articles on The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey

this article JonBenét Ramsey Ransom Note Holds Coded Clues To Murder Mastermind
'The mastermind of the murder does want people to know who he is.'
By Radar Staff
Posted on Sep 12, 2018 @ 7:08AM

one day after i am typing this

Exclusive
JonBenét Ramsey Ransom Note Holds Coded Clues To Murder Mastermind
'The mastermind of the murder does want people to know who he is.'
By Radar Staff
Posted on Sep 12, 2018 @ 7:08AM

Nearly 22 years after the brutal murder of child beauty queen JonBenét Ramsey Opens a New Window. , the case has been blown wide open by the mysterious ransom note left at the scene of the crime — which is believed to contain coded messages that identify her killer.

RadarOnline.com has learned the 350-word note is filled with a bizarre series of lettered patterns and words written backward Opens a New Window. that investigators have been analyzing with CSI-like forensic lighting.

Now the cryptic ransom note has sparked a fresh manhunt in Boulder, Colo., where a crack team of cold case investigators is assisting detectives.

“Without a doubt this is a breakthrough for the teams working on this case Opens a New Window. ,” said a top law enforcement source. “It’s another step toward revealing the identity of those responsible.

https://radaronline.com/exclusives/2018/09/jonbenet-ramsey-ransom-note-holds-coded-clues-to-murder-mastermind/


there are of course comments

Oh come on, Patsy wrote the note.

Drama queen Patsy was the author of that note.  There is no other plausible explanation based on what's in the note and all the other details that go with this.  Why would someone write a three page ransom note on Patsy's pad using Patsy's pen then kill the kid and hide her in the basement?  Give me a break.

With Patsy's handwriting.

and then when the deadline came, no one even remembered

At first I thought maybe Patsy and john went to their friends xmas party and left the kids alone so they wouldn't dampen the fun and so they could have fun at home.

And someone broke in and killed her, and they wanted to cover up the fact that they left young kids alone.

Then I found it weird how both parents had separate attys and that they avoided any press.

Nonsense.  Patsy wrote the note.  There were drafts found in the house.  No stranger comes in, kills the child and takes the time to write and re-write a rambling 3 page ransom note.

the question is: why was Patsy not held accountable?
the answer is: they had ties to the elites. there is a video on reallygraceful on YT

My next theory was Patsy was having an affair and she wanted out of her marriage so she staged a kidnapping using her lover as the kidnapper. But he look it too far and killed her.  The discord between both Patsy and John was odd.

seriously? that's quite imaginative but I think we should consult Occam's Razor on this first

This just does not make sense.  What kidnapper(s) enter a home, take the time to find a pen and paper, write a LONG , detailed note (estimated time to write that note was 20 minutes) and then take the time to return the pad of paper and pen to the desk where they found it?  If they're there to kidnap a child, they're going to either come with the note ahead of time or scribble a quick note once inside the home.Their goal is to get in and get out ASAP.  It makes no sense that a kidnapper entered the home, got the paper/pen, took 20 minutes to write the note, returned the paper/pen to the desk where it came from, and then took JonBenet and decided to kill her instead of kidnap her? Why would they leave the note behind after killing her?  That's evidence!  And seriously...the "kidnapper" is kind and considerate enough to return the pad of paper and pen to the desk where it came from yet doesn't bat an eye at murdering a little girl????

Stick to mindless gossîp, chappies. Yer outta yer element with crime. It's laughable, really.

More to the point, who goes looking for a notepad and and pen, sits themselves down at the kitchen counter to compose a 3-page ransom note, starts a page and tosses it, and then starts again - and then doesn't bother taking the little girl for the ransom that is demanded?

That you, Patsy?

all these posters everywhere say its simple

Patsy wrote the note.  

With Patsy's handwriting.

This just does not make sense.  What kidnapper(s) enter a home, take the time to find a pen and paper, write a LONG , detailed note (estimated time to write that note was 20 minutes) and then take the time to return the pad of paper and pen to the desk where they found it?  If they're there to kidnap a child, they're going to either come with the note ahead of time or scribble a quick note once inside the home.Their goal is to get in and get out ASAP.  It makes no sense that a kidnapper entered the home, got the paper/pen, took 20 minutes to write the note, returned the paper/pen to the desk where it came from, and then took JonBenet and decided to kill her instead of kidnap her? Why would they leave the note behind after killing her?  That's evidence!  And seriously...the "kidnapper" is kind and considerate enough to return the pad of paper and pen to the desk where it came from yet doesn't bat an eye at murdering a little girl????

therefore according to RDI tabloid

Patsy wrote the note, it's Patsy's handwriting.

now, how would you address this question using  a scientific analysis of questioned documents?

would a scientifically trained forensic document examiner say

Patsy wrote it because

This just does not make sense.  What kidnapper(s) enter a home, take the time to find a pen and paper, write a LONG , detailed note (estimated time to write that note was 20 minutes) and then take the time to return the pad of paper and pen to the desk where they found it?  If they're there to kidnap a child, they're going to either come with the note ahead of time or scribble a quick note once inside the home.Their goal is to get in and get out ASAP.  It makes no sense that a kidnapper entered the home, got the paper/pen, took 20 minutes to write the note, returned the paper/pen to the desk where it came from, and then took JonBenet and decided to kill her instead of kidnap her? Why would they leave the note behind after killing her?  That's evidence!  And seriously...the "kidnapper" is kind and considerate enough to return the pad of paper and pen to the desk where it came from yet doesn't bat an eye at murdering a little girl????

how would a would a scientifically trained forensic document examiner approach the question?

were there any  scientifically trained forensic document examiner who weigh in on the question of Patsy's authorship of the jonbenet ransom note and if so, what was their conclusion?

did they in fact conclude Patsy wrote the ransom note?

are sites like websmear forumsforjackasses reddit topix etc doing the public a favor in NOT promoting an actual science based understanding of this question?

what is justice and what role does science play in securing justice?

imagine a poll says that 99% of Americans when questioned believe that Patsy wrote the note, it's Patsy's handwriting.

thats translates to 350+ million americans

but 6 highly qualified forensic document examiners, using science and examining the originals, concluded that patsy is eliminated, using a scientifically tested approach.

so what is justice, for the court to reply on 6 FDE's who examined the originals, or listen to the 350 million americans who say patsy wrote the ransom note.

do you think that's air you're breating. again.