why law professor Paul Campos of the University of Colorado in Boulder is an idiot part 5

View previous topic View next topic Go down

why law professor Paul Campos of the University of Colorado in Boulder is an idiot part 5

Post by redpill on Sun Oct 04, 2015 9:05 pm

Like a Star @ heaven this is Paul Campos



he's a law professor @ Univ Colorado at Boulder

this is what he claims

paul campos wrote:
The letter in effect declared the Ramseys innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. Under the circumstances, this is, to put it mildly, a bizarre conclusion.


Yet for reasons known only to herself (she has refused all requests for interviews) Lacy has concluded that, in her words, there "is no innocent explanation" for the presence of this DNA on the child's clothing, and that therefore the DNA belongs to the child's murderer.

this is what the letter says
mary lacy wrote:

In early August of 2007, District Attorney Lacy attended a Continuing Education Program in West Virginia sponsored by the National Institute of Justice on Forensic Biology and DNA. The presenters discussed successful outcomes from a new methodology described as “touch DNA.” One method for sampling for touch DNA is the “scraping method.” In this process, forensic scientists scrape a surface where there is no observable stain or other indication of possible DNA in an effort to recover for analysis any genetic material that might nonetheless be present. This methodology was not well known in this country until recently and is still used infrequently.

In October of 2007, we decided to pursue the possibility of submitting additional items from the JonBenet Ramsey homicide to be examined using this methodology. We checked with a number of Colorado sources regarding which private laboratory to use for this work. Based upon multiple recommendations, including that of the Boulder Police Department, we contacted the Bode Technology Group located near Washington, D.C., and initiated discussions with the professionals at that laboratory. First Assistant District Attorney Peter Maguire and Investigator Andy Horita spent a full day with staff members at the Bode facility in early December of 2007.

The Bode Technology laboratory applied the “touch DNA” scraping method to both sides of the waist area of the long johns that JonBenet Ramsey was wearing over her underwear when her body was discovered. These sites were chosen because evidence supports the likelihood that the perpetrator removed and/or replaced the long johns, perhaps by handling them on the sides near the waist.

On March 24, 2008, Bode informed us that they had recovered and identified genetic material from both sides of the waist area of the long johns. The unknown male profile previously identified from the inside crotch area of the underwear matched the DNA recovered from the long johns at Bode.

We consulted with a DNA expert from a different laboratory, who recommended additional investigation into the remote possibility that the DNA might have come from sources at the autopsy when this clothing was removed. Additional samples were obtained and then analyzed by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation to assist us in this effort. We received those results on June 27th of this year and are, as a result, confidant that this DNA did not come from innocent sources at the autopsy. As mentioned above, extensive DNA testing had previously excluded people connected to the family and to the investigation as possible innocent sources.

I want to acknowledge my appreciation for the efforts of the Boulder Police Department, Bode Technology Group, the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, and the Denver Police Department Forensic Laboratory for the great work and assistance they have contributed to this investigation.

The unexplained third party DNA on the clothing of the victim is very significant and powerful evidence. It is very unlikely that there would be an innocent explanation for DNA found at three different locations on two separate items of clothing worn by the victim at the time of her murder. This is particularly true in this case because the matching DNA profiles were found on genetic material from inside the crotch of the victim’s underwear and near the waist on both sides of her long johns, and because concerted efforts that might identify a source, and perhaps an innocent explanation, were unsuccessful.

let's revisit Paul Campos claims


paul campos wrote:
The letter in effect declared the Ramseys innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. Under the circumstances, this is, to put it mildly, a bizarre conclusion.


Yet for reasons known only to herself (she has refused all requests for interviews) Lacy has concluded that, in her words, there "is no innocent explanation" for the presence of this DNA on the child's clothing, and that therefore the DNA belongs to the child's murderer.

1- she describes the reasons and the scientific methodology with which she arrived at this conclusion. by no stretch of the imagination could these be described as "reasons known only to herself"
2- there are other crimes with which were solved with touch dna found on clothing and items handled by offenders using the methodology described
3- the letter is clear multiple DNA experts were consulted in arriving at these conclusions.
4- other departments were consulted in arriving at these conclusions

These are all very apparent in the letter Paul Campos claimed he read. apparently reading comprehension is not his strong suit.


if you live in Colorado and you are thinking of hiring a lawyer for contract law, criminal law, real estate, divorce, or anything really, remember this is the face of Paul Campos

remember this face and remember the name Paul Campos



if he has a hard time with reading comprehension Mary Lacy's letter he may have difficulty with anything that requires reading, which is what lawyers do. remember that face before you hire him as a lawyer and ask if he cannot understand Mary lacy's letter how can he help you in your legal problems?





What a Face

_________________
If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side
avatar
redpill

Posts : 1729
Join date : 2012-12-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum