How would a forensic scientist reconstruct the Jonbenet crime scene?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

How would a forensic scientist reconstruct the Jonbenet crime scene?

Post by redpill on Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:37 pm

Suspect trasha griffith pictured below is an example of an anti-science denialist



trasha wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

As owner, I do my best to stay out of actual discussions about a crime.

The JBR case is the one expection.

Websleuths is a leader in true crime information as well as discussion. People come here to get information. It is imperative we deal with the facts. Not fantasy.

All I ask for are facts and a logical connecting of the dots. Logic and facts.

this is her qualifications on forensic evidence

Contact me at: triciastruecrimeradio@gmail.com ........ Based on the wildly popular true crime forum Websleuths.com (www.websleuths.com/forums) and Forums for Justice.org (www.forumsforjustice.org/forums) this radio show is unlike any other show you have heard before. Each week Tricia's True Crime Radio features several intriguing true crime cases. Host Tricia Griffith is a veteran radio disc jockey and owner of Websleuths.com and owner of Forums for Justice.org. She brings her unique brand of broadcasting, knowledge and (at times) humor her Websleuths radio Websleuths radio, True Crime, Current Events, Always Discussed with Common Sense!!! The opinions expressed on Tricia's True Crime Radio are those of the hosts and guests re

unfortunately not a single RDI poster on websleuth, forumsforjustice, topix, crimeshots reddit has any training and qualifications in forensic science.

How would a forensic scientist reconstruct the Jonbenet crime scene? Would a forensic scientist with the appropriate training, using scientific methodology in crime scene reconstruction, and with access to the actual evidence they found at the crime scene conclude RDI or IDI?

you point out that at the crime scene they found multiple forms of unidentified and unsourced trace evidence in the form of fiber, animal hair, unsourced cord, tape, unidentified hi-tech shoe print to a forensic scientist with the following credentials:


Curriculum vitae: James L. Norris
·
Current Employment
Consultant in Forensic Science

3130 Alpine Road #228 - 137
Portola Valley, CA 94028
(650) 799-6390
(650) 851-7229 (Fax)
Forensic@Jim-Norris.com
www.Jim-Norris.com
· Education

Bachelor of Science, magna cum laude, Chemistry, California State University, Fresno

Master of Science, Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley
· Professional Employment

1995 to 2004 (Retired) - Director, San Francisco Police Department Forensic Services Division

Responsible for the overall management of the Forensic Services Division which includes the Criminalistics Laboratory, Crime Scene Investigation Unit, Photography Section, Polygraph Unit, Computer and Cellular Telephone Analysis Unit, Forensic Art Unit, and the Identification Bureau.

1987 to 1995 - Senior Criminalist, San Francisco Police Department Criminalistics Laboratory

Responsible for the supervision of the Criminalistics Laboratory and the analysis of physical evidence in complex cases. Testimony in the Municipal, Superior and Federal District courts as an expert witness in several areas of forensic science, including firearms identification, ballistics, crime scene reconstruction, trace evidence examination, and the effects of alcohol and drugs of abuse on human behavior and driving performance. Supervision of the narcotics analysis, firearms and tool marks, questioned document, trace evidence, arson, forensic serology, and DNA programs. Responsible for the Forensic Alcohol Program.

1974 to 1987 - Criminalist, Santa Clara County District Attorney, Criminalistics Laboratory

Assigned to the major case section of the laboratory, which involved the analysis of physical evidence in violent crimes. Testimony in the Municipal, Superior courts as an expert witness in several areas of forensic science, including firearms identification, ballistics, crime scene reconstruction, forensic serology, trace evidence examination, and the effects of alcohol and drugs of abuse on human behavior and driving performance.

1970 to 1974 - Criminalist, San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office Crime Laboratory

Analysis of physical evidence and testimony in the Municipal, Superior courts as an expert witness in several areas of forensic science, including firearms identification, ballistics, crime scene reconstruction, forensic serology, narcotics analysis, and trace evidence examination.
· Certification

Forensic Alcohol Supervisor, Santa Clara County, 1978 to 1987

Forensic Alcohol Supervisor, City and County of San Francisco, 1987 to 2004

Administrator and Person Responsible for Forensic Alcohol Analysis for the San Francisco Police Department, 1995 to 2004
· Professional Associations

California Association of Criminalists (Past President, Regional Director, Editorial Secretary and Membership Secretary)

American Academy of Forensic Sciences

California Association of Crime Laboratory Directors

Law Enforcement Video Association (LEVA)
· Professional Activities

Member, Users’ Advisory Board, California Criminalistics Institute (Representing the California Association of Crime Laboratory Directors)

Instructor in Homicide Investigation, California State University, San Jose

Instructor in Sexual Assault Investigation, California State University, San Jose

Instructor in Property Management, California State University, San Jose

Instructor in the effects of alcohol on human behavior and driving performance and the ability of subjects to perform field sobriety tests, San Francisco Police Department Academy

Consultant in Alcohol Impairment, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Nuclear Division

would forensic scientist and criminalist James L. Norris there is not a "scintilla of evidence of an intruder?" no, the conclusion we know is that the evidence supports intruder theory.

in addition to the unsourced trace fiber hair shoeprint evidence you present the DNA evidence to a DNA expert with following credentials
CONSULTING AND EDUCATION IN FORENSIC SCIENCE

Norah Rudin

View Norah's curriculum vitae.

Norah Rudin holds a B.A. from Pomona College and a Ph.D. from Brandeis University. She is a member of the California Association of Criminalists, the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, and a Diplomate of the American Board of Criminalistics. After completing a post-doctoral fellowship at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, she served three years as a full-time consultant/technical leader for the California Department of Justice DNA Laboratory and has also served as consulting technical leader for the Idaho Department of Law Enforcement DNA Laboratory, the San Francisco Crime Laboratory DNA Section, and the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department DNA Laboratory. Dr. Rudin has co-authored An Introduction to DNA Forensic Analysis and Principles and Practice of Criminalistics: The Profession of Forensic Science. She is also the author of the Dictionary of Modern Biology. Dr. Rudin has taught a variety of general forensic and forensic DNA courses for the University of California at Berkeley extension and on-line. She is frequently invited to speak at various legal symposia and forensic conferences, and recently served a guberatorial appointment to the Virginia Department of Forensic Science Scientific Advisory Committee. She is currently co-chair of the Constitution Project Committee on DNA Collection. She remains active as an independent consultant and expert witness in forensic DNA.


Dr. Rudin and Mr. Inman have formed the non-profit company SCIEG (Scientific Collaboration, Innovation, and Education) for the purpose of developing Lab Retriever, a software tool to perform likelihood ratios with a probability of drop-out, and more generally to further forensic science education in general.


we already know the conclusion of the DNA expert. there is no innocent explanation.

DNA expert + criminalist both in intruder theory over RDI

BPD and the DA"s office rely on forensic reports created by highly trained and accreddited forensic scientists in various areas of specialities, with low-level access to the original reports.

conclusion
Mark Beckner - the suspect is the donator of the DNA

no RDI on any forum has any qualification to evaluate DNA and other trace evidence. forensic scientists who do have the qualification concluded using established scientific methodology and crime scene reconstruction that an intruder did this What a Face Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven

_________________
If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side
avatar
redpill

Posts : 1727
Join date : 2012-12-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum