murder of kent heitholt renactment and Jonbenet Ramsey intruder theory

imateapot51 wrote:
Sometimes investigators have a hunch someone is guilty and then fit the evidence and ignore exculpatory evidence  to prove their hunch rather than let the evidence dictate their opinions.  In the case of Boyd, sometimes investigators have a hunch a person is innocent and then fit the evidence and ignore incriminating evidence to support their erroreous hunch.  They did both in this case.   

ron hendry wrote:My investigation has been limited by access to information only found on the internet. Notwithstanding this limitation, hopefully some of my analysis and findings in the following articles may assist the police in a proper ending to this case. Some of my findings explained in the following articles are:

Currently no killer-specific identifying evidence has been developed that has a high degree of assurance of only being left by the killer
Such evidence would identify only the killer and eliminate other persons of interest from being involved in the murder of Kent Heitholt
Why the severed belt buckle offers the best prospect for finding killer-specific DNA identifying evidence and where on the buckle to look for it
The watch that was taken was likely destroyed in the assault and this suggests robbery was not the reason it was taken
Considerable evidence on the vehicle and pavement was not discussed or plausibly explained as to how it was generated in the Ryan Ferguson trial
For instance, several downward scrub markings on the vehicle were consistent with having been made by the assault weapon during the striking process
These weapon markings suggest a two handed grip assault weapon with the weapon likely being rectangular in shape
One marking on the left rear tire suggests a thickness for the assault weapon of one plus inch
The pavement and vehicle markings present a picture of a frantic-moving-about struggle between Heitholt and the assaulting person until the conflict centers at the left rear wheel

A tire tool was promoted as the assault weapon during the Ryan Ferguson trial. More recently Pathologist Blum promoted a nail puller as the assault weapon.

Now my evaluation infers a rectangular object of the approximate size of a metal clipboard with paper storage compartments. Another possibility would be a metal or hard plastic cased notebook computer.

A more accurate determination of the assault weapon is needed as that might help identify the killer and or help eliminate others from being suspects or persons of interest. An opportunity to examine the full file of police photos and videos as well as the autopsy report and photos would most likely result in modifications and enhancement of my findings. I am also optimistic that such an examination would lead to a strong determination of the actual assault weapon.