Kristen Lindsey is back in news along with Kristen Johnson, 27 and Anjali Ramkissoon

Go down

Kristen Lindsey is back in news along with Kristen Johnson, 27 and Anjali Ramkissoon

Post by redpill on Mon Apr 25, 2016 8:34 pm


Vet accused of killing cat is fighting to keep her license

Kristen Lindsey genuinely did not think that killing a cat and than uploading it on facebook
and bragging about it would offend anyone. her friends on facebook congradulated her on her
bow killing of a cat. she's a vet.

IMO she should have her license revoked.

former nurse Kristen Johnson, 27

Female nurse, 27, caught using her iPhone to take secret pictures of unconscious patient's penis. Kristen Johnson ...

So naughty nurse Kristen after spending 4 years in nursing school to become a nurse

Nurse who took pics of patients' private parts at Syracuse ...
Mar 28, 2016 - The state Education Department announced it has approved a request from Kristen Johnson, 27, of Fulton to surrender her license. In a signed ...

i can't help but wonder if this was a male doctor or nurse taking photos of female patients ladybits if that dude would go to prison.

it's one thing to privately take a patient's photo of his penis while unconcious. nurse kristen shared it with all her coworkers. What a Face

but after 4 years of nursing school and working as a nurse for several years nurse Kristin did not think taking photos of penis of patients and freely sharing it would be a problem.

A New York nurse who took pictures of an unconscious patient’s penis turned in her nursing license according to the New York State Education Department.

The state accepted Kristen Johnson's request to surrender her license, according to a March 17 statement.

Johnson "did not contest the charge of moral unfitness in the practice," the education department said.

Johnson was arrested in May of 2015 after an investigation concluded that she took pictures of two patients at Upstate University Hospital in 2014 and sent them to her coworkers, according to

Johnson initially faced a felony charge, but her sentence was reduced after she agreed to give up her license as part of a plea deal. She will also serve three years probation for taking the unlawful surveillance pictures, WRGB-TV reported.

sample comments

Russ Smith ·
Why spend all that money and time on nursing school for something she could have got on the Internet? What a halfwit, and now, no career.
Like · Reply · 17 · Mar 29, 2016 7:47am
Kimberly Ferrell ·
Works at OnStar
Right! And a record. I lightweight want to slap her face.
Like · Reply · 3 · Mar 29, 2016 8:09am
Richard Walker ·
Sterling Heights, Michigan
Had it been a Male Doctor taking photos of women.....he would be in prison
Like · Reply · 59 · Mar 29, 2016 8:26am
Jim Alba ·
Annandale High
Some idiots will always try to drag politics into every story.
Like · Reply · 32 · Mar 29, 2016 10:04am

i wonder how former nurse Kristen Johnson, 27 would feel is someone took a photo of her genitals while she was unconcious or during a pelvic exam and then shared it with friends.
now that she lost her license i wonder what she's doing now.

neurology resident  Anjali Ramkissoon

has been fired for some kind of explosive violent temper tantrum. and she's an MD.

The doctor is out … of a job.

A pint-size Miami medical professional who infamously lost it on an Uber driver has now lost her job.

Dr. Anjali Ramkissoon has been terminated by Jackson Health System, where she served as a resident doctor, a spokeswoman said in a statement Friday.

“She is entitled to an appeal process,” the two-sentence statement reads.

Ramkissoon was publicly shamed after video of her drunkenly berating an Uber driver went viral in January. The fourth-year neurology resident had hopped in the ride that had been hailed by someone else.

“You don’t know who the f--k you’re messing with right now,” Ramkissoon yelled at the driver, later identified as Igor Belic.

The string of verbal, and physical, abuse continued, with Ramkissoon tossing things out of the car, kneeing Belic in the groin and yelling at him to drive her home.

“Get in the f-----g car! Get the f--k in this car you f-----g piece of s--t!” she screamed in the five-minute clip.

“I have lost my mind!” she yelled at gawking passersby.

The infamous incident racked up nearly 7 million views on YouTube — and sidelined Ramkissoon from her job.

The administrative leave lasted until Friday, when she was fired. It’s unclear if she plans to appeal.

In the interim, Ramkissoon went on a goodwill tour that included a stop on “Good Morning America.”

“There’s absolutely no excuse for my actions,” she said in a teary interview. “I’m ashamed. I’m so sorry. I’ve hurt so many people.”

The doctor claimed she’d been dumped and her father had been hospitalized in the hours before the embarrassing drunken scene.

“In the moment I was just so angry, I wasn’t really thinking. If I could take it back I would,” Ramkissoon told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.

IMO she should not be granted a license to practice medicine. No No No No

whenever i hear

over at websleuths posters have claimed

detective pinkie wrote:
Hold yourself to the same standards - explain why an intruder would leave a body and a note, simply and believably

tawny wrote:
the fail in logic is astounding.

This is an example of NO IDI explanation. Why would an intruder hide her body? Seriously, please answer that for me. Why would an intruder hide her body rather than take her with them and dump her, or leave her where she was? Did an intruder seriously believe she would NEVER EVER be found inside the house?

Serious question: Why would an intruder hide her body in a dark room in a basement?

If he wanted to ensure it was found, why hide it? If he had to bug out, not taking the kidnapped-turned-murdered with him, why did he leave the note?

Delay discovery to what end? If he were bugging out, why would he care when, where, and how she's found?

It makes zero logical sense.

ukguy wrote:
Why does an intruder need to bother with a RN at all, all that sitting around authoring a RN, increases the risk of being caught.

No JonBenet in the house tells its own story, when followed up with a ransom phone call, no RN is required.

There is no IDI explanation forthcoming as to why the said intruder did not remove JonBenet from the house, which is just as inconsistent as any staged kidnapping leaving JonBenet in the house!

Intruder plan of action: Enter Ramsey household remove JonBenet, dead or alive, relocate to the boot of awaiting car, then simply drive away. Next day phone ransom demands. Total time to execute less than fifteen minutes!

nimyat of reddit wrote:
There is absolutely 0 reason to start to write a draft ransom note and then write the real thing and make it that ridiculously long.

If it was a premeditated kidnapping, ('hid in the house' theory) why the fuck wouldn't you bring a ransome note with you and why the hell would you start to draft one and then write one on paper found in the house.

If it was a burglary turned kidnapping, why would you start to draft a ransom note, and then write the real thing 4 pages long? You would scribble something like "I've taken your daughter, dont contact police, deposit money at this location at this time if you want to see her again." A panicked burglar does not sit and start writing about his 'organisation'.

A lot of people get bogged down in the details of the case, because it is a fascinating one and it is very interesting, but the ransom note is the most ridiculous thing ever and was totally written by one of the family in my opinion. They also completely over thought it - mentioning the fathers business, his bonus, writing 4 pages worth etc.

There's no way the family wasn't involved. As for which one did it, that is what is hard to prove.

docg makes a similar claim
docg wrote:


An intruder intending to express his anger or disdain for the Ramseys would have had no reason to write a meaningless ransom note. A kidnapper would not have left both the note and the body. If the parents were involved in this together, as so many assume, such a note might serve to throw the police off the track, but only if the body were found, days later, in some remote area. Or never found. With the body hidden in the house, where it is sure to be discovered, the note only creates problems for the Ramseys, the only ones who could "logically" have written it. If they were not planning on getting the body out of the house before the police came, then why would they write an obviously phony note?

Also, why was the note hand printed? Why not print it via computer? Or paste words together from newspapers? If the parents, or anyone at all close to the family, wrote it, they would be risking exposure for sure.


No intruder would have had anything to gain by writing the ransom note. No intruder would have any reason to write it. A kidnapper would have taken the child (or her body) with him. If something had gone wrong with his plan, he would have had no reason to leave a possibly incriminating note. Someone intending to frame John or Patsy would not have written the note in his own hand, as that would be evidence of an intruder. The conclusion is simple: there was no kidnapper. There was no intruder. The note must have been written by someone on the inside -- and it does indeed read like a staged kidnapping attempt.

essentially people are making similar comments about

Kristen Lindsey Kristen Johnson, 27 and Anjali Ramkissoon

why risk your career? yet at the end they did it anyway.
Kristen Lindsey genuinely did not believe she would cause any outrage over what she did. No No

if someone wants to do something even if it makes no sense to you, if they want to do something they'll do it.

If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side

Posts : 2456
Join date : 2012-12-08

Back to top Go down

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum