update! arrest made for 1984 Clark Handa, 3 years old Michael Anthony Blas Fejarang

Go down

update! arrest made for 1984 Clark Handa, 3 years old Michael Anthony Blas Fejarang

Post by redpill on Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:48 am



over at websleuths posters have claimed

detective pinkie wrote:
Hold yourself to the same standards - explain why an intruder would leave a body and a note, simply and believably

tawny wrote:
the fail in logic is astounding.

This is an example of NO IDI explanation. Why would an intruder hide her body? Seriously, please answer that for me. Why would an intruder hide her body rather than take her with them and dump her, or leave her where she was? Did an intruder seriously believe she would NEVER EVER be found inside the house?

Serious question: Why would an intruder hide her body in a dark room in a basement?

If he wanted to ensure it was found, why hide it? If he had to bug out, not taking the kidnapped-turned-murdered with him, why did he leave the note?

Delay discovery to what end? If he were bugging out, why would he care when, where, and how she's found?

It makes zero logical sense.

ukguy wrote:
Why does an intruder need to bother with a RN at all, all that sitting around authoring a RN, increases the risk of being caught.

No JonBenet in the house tells its own story, when followed up with a ransom phone call, no RN is required.

There is no IDI explanation forthcoming as to why the said intruder did not remove JonBenet from the house, which is just as inconsistent as any staged kidnapping leaving JonBenet in the house!

Intruder plan of action: Enter Ramsey household remove JonBenet, dead or alive, relocate to the boot of awaiting car, then simply drive away. Next day phone ransom demands. Total time to execute less than fifteen minutes!

nimyat of reddit wrote:
There is absolutely 0 reason to start to write a draft ransom note and then write the real thing and make it that ridiculously long.

If it was a premeditated kidnapping, ('hid in the house' theory) why the fuck wouldn't you bring a ransome note with you and why the hell would you start to draft one and then write one on paper found in the house.

If it was a burglary turned kidnapping, why would you start to draft a ransom note, and then write the real thing 4 pages long? You would scribble something like "I've taken your daughter, dont contact police, deposit money at this location at this time if you want to see her again." A panicked burglar does not sit and start writing about his 'organisation'.

A lot of people get bogged down in the details of the case, because it is a fascinating one and it is very interesting, but the ransom note is the most ridiculous thing ever and was totally written by one of the family in my opinion. They also completely over thought it - mentioning the fathers business, his bonus, writing 4 pages worth etc.

There's no way the family wasn't involved. As for which one did it, that is what is hard to prove.

docg makes a similar claim
docg wrote:


An intruder intending to express his anger or disdain for the Ramseys would have had no reason to write a meaningless ransom note. A kidnapper would not have left both the note and the body. If the parents were involved in this together, as so many assume, such a note might serve to throw the police off the track, but only if the body were found, days later, in some remote area. Or never found. With the body hidden in the house, where it is sure to be discovered, the note only creates problems for the Ramseys, the only ones who could "logically" have written it. If they were not planning on getting the body out of the house before the police came, then why would they write an obviously phony note?

Also, why was the note hand printed? Why not print it via computer? Or paste words together from newspapers? If the parents, or anyone at all close to the family, wrote it, they would be risking exposure for sure.


No intruder would have had anything to gain by writing the ransom note. No intruder would have any reason to write it. A kidnapper would have taken the child (or her body) with him. If something had gone wrong with his plan, he would have had no reason to leave a possibly incriminating note. Someone intending to frame John or Patsy would not have written the note in his own hand, as that would be evidence of an intruder. The conclusion is simple: there was no kidnapper. There was no intruder. The note must have been written by someone on the inside -- and it does indeed read like a staged kidnapping attempt.

Michael Anthony Blas Fejarang, who is currently serving a 26-year prison sentence related to separate child molestation cases from Solano County in 1981, 2001 and 2002, was charged Monday with first-degree murder with special circumstances and kidnapping for ransom, Fairfield police said.

Fejarang, who was a family friend of the Handas, lived in Fairfield and was 23 years old at the time of Clark's disappearance."

Source: http://www.kcra.com/news/arrest-made-in-1984-coldcase-killing-of-fairfield-3yearold/39226496

Previously covered on /r/UnresolvedMysteries by /u/BeyonceIsBetter here: https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/3ot3sc/the_unusual_kidnapping_of_clark_tosho_handa/


Prison inmate charged in 1984 kidnapping, murder of 3-year-old Fairfield boy
Inmate charged in 1984 kidnapping, murder of Fairfield boy
The Solano County District Attorney's Office charged a state prison inmate Tuesday with the 1984 kidnapping and homicide of a 3-year-old boy. (KGO-TV)
Bay City News
Tuesday, April 26, 2016 06:39PM
FAIRFIELD, Calif. --
The Solano County District Attorney's Office charged a state prison inmate Tuesday with the 1984 kidnapping and homicide of a 3-year-old boy.

Michael Anthony Blas Fejarang, 57, an inmate at Valley State Prison in Chowchilla, is accused of the murder and kidnapping of Clark Toshiro Handa on Aug. 22, 1984. The boy was abducted from the bedroom at his home on Magellan Road, now Auto Mall Parkway, Fairfield police Lt. Rob Lenke

A ransom note demanding money for the boy's safe return was found, but the boy's family did not hear further from the kidnapper and the boy was not returned home, Lenke said.
Fairfield police and the FBI continued investigating the case. The Fairfield Police Department's Cold Case Unit and the FBI reexamined the case in 2011 and obtained evidence that led to the identification of Fejarang, a friend of the Handa family at the time, as the suspect, Lenke said. Lenke would not disclose that evidence.

Fejarang is serving a 26-year prison term for separate child molestation cases in Solano County in 1981, 2001 and 2002, Lenke said.

The district attorney's office will work with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to transfer Fejarang to Solano County for trial, Lenke said. The case was filed in Solano County Superior Court Tuesday, according to the court docket.

The case remains an active investigation and no further information will be released, Lenke said.

Fejarang left behind a handwritten ransom note but Clark Handa's family was not rich.

his actual motive though was pedophilia/sexual.

if Fejarang can leave behind a ransom note making ransom demand money, but his actual interest is sexual molestation, then Jonbenets killer can be similarly motivated.

Fejarang reason for leaving a ransom note making ransom demands is to make it appear a kidnapping for ransom money. his actual motive is sexual.

Jonbenet's killer may be similarly motivated.

the RDI objection has no merit Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven

If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side

Posts : 2285
Join date : 2012-12-08

Back to top Go down

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum