the genetic genealogy question RDI can't answer

Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:55 pm


RDI have claimed there's no evidence of an intruder. they deny DNA is evidence of an intruder.

so the the genetic genealogy question RDI can't answer is,

in 2018 they performed additional DNA tests and retested the crime scene evidence, no report on what was found,

if in the near future DNA scientists using genetic genealogy identify an exact DNA match to an individual whose DNA matches what was found on JBR clothing, living or dead,

is that person a suspect ? why or why not?

and what kind of evidence would you look for from this suspect?

do you think it would be a miss carriage of justice of that person, who obviously is not any Ramsey, to be charged with the murder of JBR, if still alive?

if the person is deceased, how would you feel if BPD announce the case is closed?

as an intruder theorist, the answer is easy

the person thus identified is the suspect. every aspect of a traditional investigation should be used to link him to JBR.

it'd be interesting if this suspect is an Australian national from Melbourne