touch DNA is evidence of an intruder contrary to websleuth forumsforjustice RDI claims

Sat Jan 02, 2021


is the touch DNA found on clothing of JonBenet Ramsey evidence of an intruder?

trasha pictured below is an example of an anti-science denialist




this is what she claims

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?76520-Patsy-Ramsey/page92

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

As owner, I do my best to stay out of actual discussions about a crime.

The JBR case is the one expection.

Websleuths is a leader in true crime information as well as discussion. People come here to get information. It is imperative we deal with the facts. Not fantasy.

All I ask for are facts and a logical connecting of the dots. Logic and facts.

When I get time I will be going through the forum to make sure the JonBenet Ramsey forum is being held up to the high standards just like all our other forums on Websleuths.

The days of allowing anyone to post anything because it's part of their "theory" are gone. Facts and logic. Very simple.

this is her qualifications

Host Tricia Griffith is a veteran radio disc jockey and owner of Websleuths.com and owner of Forums for Justice.org.

in other words she has ZERO qualifications in forensic science. she has no training in forensic fiber, trace evidence, DNA yet she claims

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

and

Forteanforever 3 points 3 days ago*

The DNA is not evidence that someone was in the house. It is evidence that there was DNA on the clothes, period. There are common ways for DNA to be transfered to clothes during manufacture and packaging. If that same DNA appeared elsewhere in the house you would be onto something. As it is, without a match and evidence that the person whose DNA it is was in the house it isn't much.
.

 Nov. 27, 1990 murder of Minerva Cantu, 26, in Lake Worth





she was murdered in her own home,

these DNA scientists






test her clothes for touch DNA







via touch DNA they found  Minerva Cantu, 26, profile on her orange shirt, and it is a mixed profile, her's and unknown DNA profile.


so is finding a mixed DNA profile via touch DNA on Minerva Cantu, 26  orange shirt

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

The DNA is not evidence that someone was in the house. It is evidence that there was DNA on the clothes, period.

that's the RDI claim.

finding via touch DNA skin cells a mixed DNA profile is not  "one scintilla of evidence of an intruder"


pictured below is intruder





it took 28 years and advances in touch DNA to solve this crime

now since tricia griffith and RDI posters claim






touch DNA is never evidence of an intruder, should everyone who has been convicted via touch DNA be released from prison?

or should we admit RDI websleuth and forumsforjustice are just ignorant fools?