a simple answer why leave body and ransom note- its called a prank

View previous topic View next topic Go down

a simple answer why leave body and ransom note- its called a prank

Post by redpill on Mon Sep 28, 2015 12:18 am

over at websleuths posters have claimed

detective pinkie wrote:
Hold yourself to the same standards - explain why an intruder would leave a body and a note, simply and believably

tawny wrote:
the fail in logic is astounding.

This is an example of NO IDI explanation. Why would an intruder hide her body? Seriously, please answer that for me. Why would an intruder hide her body rather than take her with them and dump her, or leave her where she was? Did an intruder seriously believe she would NEVER EVER be found inside the house?

Serious question: Why would an intruder hide her body in a dark room in a basement?


If he wanted to ensure it was found, why hide it? If he had to bug out, not taking the kidnapped-turned-murdered with him, why did he leave the note?

Delay discovery to what end? If he were bugging out, why would he care when, where, and how she's found?

It makes zero logical sense.


ukguy wrote:
Mama2JML,
Why does an intruder need to bother with a RN at all, all that sitting around authoring a RN, increases the risk of being caught.

No JonBenet in the house tells its own story, when followed up with a ransom phone call, no RN is required.

There is no IDI explanation forthcoming as to why the said intruder did not remove JonBenet from the house, which is just as inconsistent as any staged kidnapping leaving JonBenet in the house!

Intruder plan of action: Enter Ramsey household remove JonBenet, dead or alive, relocate to the boot of awaiting car, then simply drive away. Next day phone ransom demands. Total time to execute less than fifteen minutes!


nimyat of reddit wrote:
There is absolutely 0 reason to start to write a draft ransom note and then write the real thing and make it that ridiculously long.

If it was a premeditated kidnapping, ('hid in the house' theory) why the fuck wouldn't you bring a ransome note with you and why the hell would you start to draft one and then write one on paper found in the house.

If it was a burglary turned kidnapping, why would you start to draft a ransom note, and then write the real thing 4 pages long? You would scribble something like "I've taken your daughter, dont contact police, deposit money at this location at this time if you want to see her again." A panicked burglar does not sit and start writing about his 'organisation'.

A lot of people get bogged down in the details of the case, because it is a fascinating one and it is very interesting, but the ransom note is the most ridiculous thing ever and was totally written by one of the family in my opinion. They also completely over thought it - mentioning the fathers business, his bonus, writing 4 pages worth etc.

There's no way the family wasn't involved. As for which one did it, that is what is hard to prove.

docg makes a similar claim
docg wrote:

Questions

An intruder intending to express his anger or disdain for the Ramseys would have had no reason to write a meaningless ransom note. A kidnapper would not have left both the note and the body. If the parents were involved in this together, as so many assume, such a note might serve to throw the police off the track, but only if the body were found, days later, in some remote area. Or never found. With the body hidden in the house, where it is sure to be discovered, the note only creates problems for the Ramseys, the only ones who could "logically" have written it. If they were not planning on getting the body out of the house before the police came, then why would they write an obviously phony note?

Also, why was the note hand printed? Why not print it via computer? Or paste words together from newspapers? If the parents, or anyone at all close to the family, wrote it, they would be risking exposure for sure.

Answers

No intruder would have had anything to gain by writing the ransom note. No intruder would have any reason to write it. A kidnapper would have taken the child (or her body) with him. If something had gone wrong with his plan, he would have had no reason to leave a possibly incriminating note. Someone intending to frame John or Patsy would not have written the note in his own hand, as that would be evidence of an intruder. The conclusion is simple: there was no kidnapper. There was no intruder. The note must have been written by someone on the inside -- and it does indeed read like a staged kidnapping attempt.

i will answer this question.



http://news.yahoo.com/cops-arrest-student-lines-powdered-212926705.html

Cops Arrest Student for Lines of Powdered Sugar

Apparently in Miami the cops don't screw around when it comes to cocaine. Maybe they're still mad about Scarface  and Cocaine Cowboys making their city look bad or something, but this University of Miami student obviously picked the wrong officers to mess with.

The student, Jonathan Harrington, thought it would be funny to leave some chopped up lines of powdered sugar, a rolled up dollar bill and some while pills (aspirin) sitting out in his dorm room before an inspection.

According to the Miami New Times, students at the university know in advance when an inspection is coming so they have plenty of time to hide their stuff.

But when the inspectors arrived and saw the "drugs," Harrington was arrested on felony cocaine possession charges. He now faces up to five years in prison.

Harrington's roommate confirmed to the New Times that the "cocaine" was actually powdered sugar, and a police report noted that the pills were merely aspirin. Harrington could be kicked out of school, but administrators have put that on hold until things are sorted out.

The police department told the newspaper that "the powder has been sent to a lab but could take up to two months to process."

So was this prank totally worth it or what? Maybe if it was just a little funnier.

why ?


The student, Jonathan Harrington, thought it would be funny to leave some chopped up lines of powdered sugar, a rolled up dollar bill and some while pills (aspirin) sitting out in his dorm room before an inspection.

and

So was this prank totally worth it or what? Maybe if it was just a little funnier.

the ransom note and body is a "funny" prank.

i have argued the ransom note and body is the perps idea of being "funny". its funny they read this rn thinking there's hope but nope she's dead.

much like this one



now its the RDI turn.

explain why the R's would risk leaving behind a RN in their own handwriting which can be traced to them, and why they didn't remove the body from the home, if they are staging the crime scene? why would the R's write such a long note, the longer the more handwriting to compare to exemplars.

_________________
If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side
avatar
redpill

Posts : 1477
Join date : 2012-12-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum