Vanessa Marcotte and Jonbenet Ramsey A Project Tricia Griffith Rebuttal

this is trasha griffith


trasha pictured below is an example of an anti-science denialist



this is what she claims

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?76520-Patsy-Ramsey/page92

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

As owner, I do my best to stay out of actual discussions about a crime.

The JBR case is the one expection.

Websleuths is a leader in true crime information as well as discussion. People come here to get information. It is imperative we deal with the facts. Not fantasy.

All I ask for are facts and a logical connecting of the dots. Logic and facts.

When I get time I will be going through the forum to make sure the JonBenet Ramsey forum is being held up to the high standards just like all our other forums on Websleuths.

The days of allowing anyone to post anything because it's part of their "theory" are gone. Facts and logic. Very simple.

this is her qualifications

Host Tricia Griffith is a veteran radio disc jockey and owner of Websleuths.com and owner of Forums for Justice.org.

in other words she has ZERO qualifications in forensic science. she has no training in forensic fiber, trace evidence, DNA yet she claims

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

this is 27-year-old Google employee as she was out jogging in broad daylight in Massachusetts. Vanessa Marcotte went for a jog on Aug. 7 near her mother's home in the town of Princeton, about 60 miles west of Boston.

She never returned, and her body was found that night in a wooded area about a half mile from her mother’s house.




during investigation they found foreign unidentified DNA on her hands.

Using RDI denialist tactics you find on the Jonbenet Ramsey forums topix ws ffj et al

what conclusions would you draw?

that the DNA has no evidentiary value. that the DNA could be secondary transfer.
the DNA could be a composite from multiple individuals.

the DNA was recovered on her hands. could come from anywhere. could come from a shaking a friend's hand. could come from a doorknob touched by another person.

1. Marcotte’s Naked Body Was Found in the Woods With Burns to Her Head, Hands & Feet, Police Say

therefore there is not a scintilla of evidence.

abc news wrote:

Authorities announced at a press conference Saturday afternoon that they had arrested 31-year-old Angel Colon-Ortiz in connection with the crime.

"We got him," Worcester County District Attorney Joseph Early Jr. said, followed by applause. "This has been a roller-coaster all along."

A DNA sample from Ortiz matched that found on Marcotte's hands, Early said.

interpreting forensics requires scientific thinking scientific reasoning scientific training, something every single RDI lacks.

what is a valid objective scientific reason that the dna found on Marcott hands is of evidentiary value and establishes ANgel Colon-Ortiz as the killer but the DNA found on Jonbenet's panties and longjohns "not a scintilla of evidence"?

remember as with Jonbenet, in these forensic DNA cases they find foreign DNA and many cases time passes before they find a suspect to match that DNA. before they find that suspect that matches the DNA, is that DNA represent a scintilla of evidence in these solved cases, and if so, what is an objective scientific standard to state the DNA found on Jonbenet is not a scintilla of evidence.

and the intruder theory is also that the intruder brought in all the unsourced evidence from the hi-tech shoe print to the fibers to the ligature.

it takes a special kind of incompetence to state that a shoe print unmatched to the Ramsey's in combination to cord and fibers that are unmatched and handwriting unmatched to the R's on the ransom note, isn't a scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

RDI are that special kind of forensic scientific incompetence