I'm a Science Lord, a practitioner of the Daubert side of the Forensics intruder theory
The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey :: The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey-BLOGS :: Redpill's Blog
Page 1 of 1
I'm a Science Lord, a practitioner of the Daubert side of the Forensics intruder theory
i'm writing this on Wed Oct 11, 2017
of the literally tens of thousands of posters on Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey on various forums ffj ws topix reddit
i'm the only one to suggest there is only one way to decide between inside job, one of the Ramsey's, or an intruder
that one way is *drums rolls*
science.
yes science. textbook science. the science that is taught at high school and universities. science as in isaac newton f=ma and einstein e=mc2
that science. or in this case, forensic science. science as it is applied to crime scenes.
scientific reasoning, scientific methodology, scientific knowledge, as it applies to Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey
since i use science, i call myself a Science Lord,
science as is applied to crimes and murders such as the jonbenet is called forensics
when it comes to forensics i use real genuine textbook science, the kind that is
standard university forensic taught and actual genuine scientific research and scientific
thinking and reasoning to arrive that an intruder is the best scientific explanation for
the forensic evidence found in the Jonbenet crime scene.
forensics includes expert witness testimony
there is a way to evaluate what a scientific expert witness is, and that is the daubert standard
this is of course far beyond the comprehension of any RDI.
the daubert standard in forensics is what i call the Daubert side of the Forensics
I'm a Science Lord, a practitioner of the Daubert side of the Forensics
daubert side of the forensics is a pathway to many intruder truths the RDI would consider to be unnatural.
when it comes to daubert, standard textbook science textbooks on handwriting
not stuff rdi posters make up to show patsy wrote the ransom note, but using scientific expert witness testimony.
rdi make stuff up or use fringe experts. science lord, a practitioner of the daubert side of the forensics knows who is actually qualified under daubert to comment on whether patsy handwriting is a match to the ransom note
rdi don't bc they are ignorants
rdi also claim well there is a lot of ransom speak in patsy and john statements that mirror ransom note like the word hence so it's a linguistics match
science lord, a practitioner of the daubert side of the forensics
uses real scientific textbooks
daubert also applies to using scientific textbooks relevant in the matter to evaluate DNA and fiber and shoe print
when you read rdi posters claiming the dna doesn't prove anything, its clear they have zero scientific background in forensic crime scene reconstruction.
there are plenty of other crimes that were solved with dna found on clothing or in cars and vehicles. and this dna should also be understood in context of the hi-tech shoe print, multiple unsourced fibers hair tape ligature, and the expert witness testimony on the ransom note, those that qualifiy under Daubert standard.
daubert side of the forensics leads to intruder theorists
that is, using scientific textbook science on the forenic evidence found on the Jonbenet crime scene leads to only 1 scientific conclusion
the best scientific explanation as to what happened to Jonbenet is that she was murdered by an intruder.
a strictly scientific explanation of the crime scene forensic evidence and expert witness testimony leads to the conclusion that Jonbenet was murdered by an intruder.
as a science lord i am a master of daubert side of the forensics
as a sleuth lord, i propose this intruder could be Mr. Cruel, or OCCK, under the scenario of a complete stranger intruder unknown to the Ramseys, in a pedophile sexually motivated attack.
of the literally tens of thousands of posters on Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey on various forums ffj ws topix reddit
i'm the only one to suggest there is only one way to decide between inside job, one of the Ramsey's, or an intruder
that one way is *drums rolls*
science.
yes science. textbook science. the science that is taught at high school and universities. science as in isaac newton f=ma and einstein e=mc2
that science. or in this case, forensic science. science as it is applied to crime scenes.
scientific reasoning, scientific methodology, scientific knowledge, as it applies to Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey
since i use science, i call myself a Science Lord,
science as is applied to crimes and murders such as the jonbenet is called forensics
when it comes to forensics i use real genuine textbook science, the kind that is
standard university forensic taught and actual genuine scientific research and scientific
thinking and reasoning to arrive that an intruder is the best scientific explanation for
the forensic evidence found in the Jonbenet crime scene.
forensics includes expert witness testimony
there is a way to evaluate what a scientific expert witness is, and that is the daubert standard
The Daubert standard provides a rule of evidence regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony
The Court defined "scientific methodology" as the process of formulating hypotheses and then conducting experiments to prove or falsify the hypothesis, and provided a set of illustrative factors (i.e., not a "test") in determining whether these criteria are met:
Whether the theory or technique employed by the expert is generally accepted in the scientific community;
Whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication;
Whether it can be and has been tested;
Whether the known or potential rate of error is acceptable; and
Whether the research was conducted independent of the particular litigation or dependent on an intention to provide the proposed testimony.[4]
this is of course far beyond the comprehension of any RDI.
the daubert standard in forensics is what i call the Daubert side of the Forensics
I'm a Science Lord, a practitioner of the Daubert side of the Forensics
daubert side of the forensics is a pathway to many intruder truths the RDI would consider to be unnatural.
when it comes to daubert, standard textbook science textbooks on handwriting
not stuff rdi posters make up to show patsy wrote the ransom note, but using scientific expert witness testimony.
rdi make stuff up or use fringe experts. science lord, a practitioner of the daubert side of the forensics knows who is actually qualified under daubert to comment on whether patsy handwriting is a match to the ransom note
rdi don't bc they are ignorants
rdi also claim well there is a lot of ransom speak in patsy and john statements that mirror ransom note like the word hence so it's a linguistics match
science lord, a practitioner of the daubert side of the forensics
uses real scientific textbooks
daubert also applies to using scientific textbooks relevant in the matter to evaluate DNA and fiber and shoe print
when you read rdi posters claiming the dna doesn't prove anything, its clear they have zero scientific background in forensic crime scene reconstruction.
there are plenty of other crimes that were solved with dna found on clothing or in cars and vehicles. and this dna should also be understood in context of the hi-tech shoe print, multiple unsourced fibers hair tape ligature, and the expert witness testimony on the ransom note, those that qualifiy under Daubert standard.
daubert side of the forensics leads to intruder theorists
that is, using scientific textbook science on the forenic evidence found on the Jonbenet crime scene leads to only 1 scientific conclusion
the best scientific explanation as to what happened to Jonbenet is that she was murdered by an intruder.
a strictly scientific explanation of the crime scene forensic evidence and expert witness testimony leads to the conclusion that Jonbenet was murdered by an intruder.
as a science lord i am a master of daubert side of the forensics
as a sleuth lord, i propose this intruder could be Mr. Cruel, or OCCK, under the scenario of a complete stranger intruder unknown to the Ramseys, in a pedophile sexually motivated attack.
_________________
If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side
redpill- Posts : 6207
Join date : 2012-12-08
Similar topics
» Daubert side of the Forensics leads to intruder theory - RDI as the quick and easy path
» DNA in JonBenet Ramsey as evidence of an intruder and the power of the Daubert Side of the Forensics
» handwriting "experts" and the power of the daubert side of the Forensics
» RDI it's Patsy's handwriting claims vs power of the daubert side of the Forensics
» Richard Dusak & Edwin F. Alford, Jr and the power of the Daubert Side of the Forensics
» DNA in JonBenet Ramsey as evidence of an intruder and the power of the Daubert Side of the Forensics
» handwriting "experts" and the power of the daubert side of the Forensics
» RDI it's Patsy's handwriting claims vs power of the daubert side of the Forensics
» Richard Dusak & Edwin F. Alford, Jr and the power of the Daubert Side of the Forensics
The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey :: The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey-BLOGS :: Redpill's Blog
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|