handwriting "experts" and the power of the daubert side of the Forensics

Go down

handwriting "experts" and the power of the daubert side of the Forensics

Post by redpill on Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:27 pm

I'm writing this on Oct 13, 2017

I did comment this when i was on crimeshots, before my apprentice SD banned me, and before CS was taken down.

but other than that, i'm not aware of any RDI, not even any RDI on forumsforjustice nor superdave nor delmar england nor any RDI on topix

it is what i call the power of the daubert side of the Forensics

the isssue that no RDI has ever wrestled with, which shows their total incompetence dishonesty lynch mob mentality,

is what makes a handwriting expert qualified?

what handwriting expert witness testimony is scientific in nature.

how to decide which handwriting experts are qualified and which are not

i did state this on crimeshots before i was banned by my sith apprentice, in my sleep no less.

plenty of handwriting graphology profilers linguists have weigned in on the claim that Patsy or John Ramsey wrote the ransom note.

there are lay RDI posters like koldkase delmar england capricorn et al, who claim that simply looking at Patsy's handwriting, then the ransom note, you can conclude Patsy wrote the ransom note. it's Patsy's handwriting.

then there are experts from Cina Wong to Tom Miller to Gideon Epstein, experts from National Association of Document examiners (NADE) and other groups, graphologists, who claim that Patsy wrote the ransom note.

Then there's Andrew Hodges of Mother Gone Bad claiming using thought prints

of course there are experts like Richard Dussak, LLoyd Cunningham, Chet Ubosowski, who said there is no match to Patsy, somewhere between 8 highly improbable, and 9 elimination on the ASTM scale.

the question is, which handwriting experts have scientific credibility

enter the power of the daubert side of the Forensics

The Court defined "scientific methodology" as the process of formulating hypotheses and then conducting experiments to prove or falsify the hypothesis, and provided a set of illustrative factors (i.e., not a "test") in determining whether these criteria are met:

Whether the theory or technique employed by the expert is generally accepted in the scientific community;
Whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication;
Whether it can be and has been tested;
Whether the known or potential rate of error is acceptable; and
Whether the research was conducted independent of the particular litigation or dependent on an intention to provide the proposed testimony.[4]

which handwriting experts are qualified under Daubert

is Cina Wong qualified under daubert? Gideon Epstein? Richard Dusack? Lloyrd Cunningham? Andrew Hodges? lay persons like Cheroke Koldkase Delmar England? what about forensic linguist Donald Foster?

under Daubert, who is and is not qualified to comment on this issue?

i did issue this challenge to SD, as a sleuth lord master of the daubert side of the forensics.

SD as a sith wannabe banned me in my sleep. it's ironic. i never saw it coming.

if RDI were committed to justice as they are not, the issue i raise, which handwriting experts are qualified to deliver scientific expert witness testimony on the ransom note and the question of whether patsy or john ramsey wrote it should be the forefront of the discussion.

the reason no rdi does this is that the handwriting experts who are actually qualified under daubert, eliminated both patsy and john ramsey as the author.

thus is the power of the daubert side of the Forensics

a power that leads to many truths the RDI would consider to be unnatural.

would it be possible to learn this power?

not from an RDI

in the Jonbenet case, it is clear actual scientific experts, using a strictly scientific approach to the investigation, have concluded that the best explanation is intruder did it, but obviously detectives, who have only minimal scientific training, detective steve thomas and james kolar, have concluded in a manner that is contrary to science, that mislead the public as to the actual scientific findings.

If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side

Posts : 2816
Join date : 2012-12-08

Back to top Go down

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum