RDI trolls "no evidence of intruder"

Forteanforever 3 points 3 days ago*

The DNA is not evidence that someone was in the house. It is evidence that there was DNA on the clothes, period. There are common ways for DNA to be transfered to clothes during manufacture and packaging. If that same DNA appeared elsewhere in the house you would be onto something. As it is, without a match and evidence that the person whose DNA it is was in the house it isn't much.

A court-ordered psychiatric evaluation (if that's what you meant) is not the same as accessing a psychiatric record which may contain information about prior behavior. Behavior trumps a psychiatric evaluation every time. Edmund Kemper had the head of one of his victims in his car trunk while he was sitting in his psychiatrist's office and the psychiatrist was writing a glowing evaluation about how much Kemper had improved.

You're claiming that an event you didn't witness was an accident. You couldn't possibly know that.

It has become obvious that every time you find yourself at a disadvantage in this discussion you insult me. This causes me to laugh.

The sounds of people getting ready to travel are very unlikely to mimic the sounds of parents who have just discovered a child missing.

One doesn't have to be an expert in body language (although I do have some knowledge in that area) to recognize someone mimicking hitting their sister over the head. Incidentally, the fact that he mimicked the thing I think he likely did rather than the action that actually killed her suggests that she was garrotted by someone else.

One doesn't have to be a behavioral analyst (although I do have some knowledge in that area) to recognize that something is decidedly "off" about the behavior of a person. The ability to recognize it is one of things that keeps us alive. It's part of pattern recognition.

Your devotion to Burke is more than a little disturbing.

When you don't know the difference between an idea, a speculation, a theory and evidence - you'll run into trouble trying to get to know a case.



Excluding the ninja pedo fetish trolls who have arrived in full regalia to degrade both these subs with their twisted pedo fan fic fantasies, I'd assume the rest of us who bother to even remain subscribed still would like to discuss the case at length and hash out theories and whatnot. I would too but after an extended break to come back and see some of these ludicrous IDI posts that are no such thing - I see a serious discussion may now be too much to ask for.



This is a fleshed out write up on some things that need to be addressed. It's not the tldr version. If you want that, oh well.



WHAT WE KNOW

There are two primary camps: RDI and IDI. Ramsey(s) Did It and Intruder Did It. In the RDI camp, we have three sub camps: Patsy Did It (all), John Did It (all), and Burke Did It (R/J cover up). We all have the basis elements down and we all know there are plenty of questions that will never, ever be answered so the most we can do is try the most sensical, intuitive, logical, reasonable, and rational speculation and see if it adds up.



When it comes to the IDI camp, at this place 20 years later, it's pretty clear that IDI is a dinosaur to everyone who is familiar with the case. We get it now, there's plenty of evidence of RDI - but which R remains up for grabs. The IDI debate ended years ago with new information, insight, and revelations. It's only a "thing" for those who for whatever reasons never followed this case, never paid much attention, just didn't delve into it beyond the age old headlines and going ideas that those who have been more involved have known for awhile are refuted, discarded, irrelevant, etc.



Then there's the other faction of IDIer that are not seriously IDIers. They are trolls or Ramsey shills or mentally disturbed sorts, and of course, the twisted Karr style fetishists who want a canvas to roll out their disturbing fetish nonsense and attach it to this case. This camp doesn't actually care about this case, the facts or the evidence, or what happened to JonBenet. Their sole agenda is to degrade the discussion. They will neither respect nor regard the following points and will likely argue them in spite of reality. By their fruits they shall be known.

The DNA is not evidence that someone was in the house. It is evidence that there was DNA on the clothes, period.

searchinGirl wrote:I’m hoping we can turn this around. That user is particularly annoying and absolutely believes she has a god given right not to be insulted. The truth comes hard to her. But I suspect it’s all a game between the subs. And I’m just a pawn they were willing to play. We we see how it works out.

Oh Jesus. Okay...

Listen to yourself.

Your account has been suspended from Reddit for misuing the report button. The suspension will last 3 days.

Your account has been suspended from Reddit for 2 days.

I think I’ll let u/sithlord2016 argue his theory at this discretion. Maybe he will read this and get back to you.

searchinGirl wrote:There seems to be a group of mods working on “the misuse of the report button”.  I can’t ever tell where the info goes to. Like I can’t tell who makes the reports. I read your pm but maybe lost it. I saved it to my profile but I’m lost here.