project tricia griffith rebuttal Jonbenet Ramsey and Sharon Faye Smith and Debra May Helmick.

this is trasha griffith


trasha pictured below is an example of an anti-science denialist



this is what she claims

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?76520-Patsy-Ramsey/page92

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

As owner, I do my best to stay out of actual discussions about a crime.

The JBR case is the one expection.

Websleuths is a leader in true crime information as well as discussion. People come here to get information. It is imperative we deal with the facts. Not fantasy.

All I ask for are facts and a logical connecting of the dots. Logic and facts.

When I get time I will be going through the forum to make sure the JonBenet Ramsey forum is being held up to the high standards just like all our other forums on Websleuths.

The days of allowing anyone to post anything because it's part of their "theory" are gone. Facts and logic. Very simple.

this is her qualifications

Host Tricia Griffith is a veteran radio disc jockey and owner of Websleuths.com and owner of Forums for Justice.org.

in other words she has ZERO qualifications in forensic science. she has no training in forensic fiber, trace evidence, DNA yet she claims

tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

Tricia claims there is no evidence of an intruder.

1- Tricia has never studied any forensics and
2- she is not familiar with the forensics in the Jonbenet Ramsey case, and how it compares with other cases.

this channel



frequently discuss crimes, murders, including other crimes involving homes as crime scenes
and the actual forensics

one show i personally watched is this one



season 1, episode 2 is about the abduction and murder of Sharon Faye Smith and Debra May Helmick



by Larry Gene Bell


Tricia is claiming there is not a scintilla of evidence of an intruder inside the Jonbenet Ramsey home.

Larry Gene Bell was a suspect and in court evidence was presented.

the question is, is there any forensic evidence Sharon Faye Smith and Debra May Helmick
were inside the home he was house sitting at the time of their abduction and murder?

forensic teams combed the house. they found no finger prints, no fluids, no blood, no hair, no personal items that show Sharon Faye Smith and Debra May Helmick were ever in the house.

what they did find in the house was fiber they were unable to source to the home, to Larry Bell, nor to the actual home owners, an elderly couple.

they found fibers in the home that matched the fibers from clothing worn from the decedents.
the decdeents also had fiber,

Small red fibers were found in Shari's hair during the examination and were consistent to the red fibers from the home's carpet.

the actual forensic trace evidence that Sharon Faye Smith and Debra May Helmick were ever in the house Larry Gene Bell was house sitting was fiber evidence found on their clothing.

this plus eye witness testimony led to Larry Bell convicted sentence to death and executed by electric chair.

using the same forensic trace evidence standard in the Larry Bell case, in the Jonbenet Ramsey case they found multiple types of fiber and hair evidence that is unsourced to the Ramsey home.

what would be a scientifically objective reason that unsourced fiber in the Larry bell murder case is evidence his victims were in his home, but unsourced jonbenet fiber found at the crime scene is not evidence of another person other than the R's were ever in the home ?

clearly like all denialists, Tricia is not scientifically responsible in explaining the actual forensic trace evidence. Really she has no business commenting on something she's never studied.

same is true for all forensic trace evidence denialists.

case also featured on murder calls