The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

1989 Murder of Stephanie Isaacson solved by using what experts say is the smallest-ever amount of human DNA to date & JonBenet Ramsey

Go down

1989 Murder of Stephanie Isaacson solved by using what experts say is the smallest-ever amount of human DNA to date & JonBenet Ramsey  Empty 1989 Murder of Stephanie Isaacson solved by using what experts say is the smallest-ever amount of human DNA to date & JonBenet Ramsey

Post by redpill Sat Jul 24, 2021 12:43 pm

Sat Jul 24, 2021 12:38 pm

I woke up this morning, and I sense that there has been a Great Disturbance in the Forensics

the last time I felt it was with my old master SD-Won

From the BBC article: “Stephanie Isaacson's murder case had gone cold until new technology made it possible to test what little remained of the suspect's DNA: the equivalent of just 15 human cells. Police on Wednesday said they had identified the suspect by using genome sequencing and public genealogy data. Her alleged killer died in 1995. "I'm glad they found who murdered my daughter," Stephanie's mother wrote in a statement that was read to reporters at Wednesday's news conference. "I never believed the case would be solved." Finding 'Grace': Murder, DNA and ancestry The 40-year hunt for a killer How familial DNA trapped a murderer for the first time Thirty-two years ago, Stephanie's body was found near the route she normally walked to school in Las Vegas, Nevada. She had been assaulted and strangled. This year, police were able to pick up the case again after a donation from a local resident. They turned over the DNA samples left to Othram, a Texas-based genome-sequencing lab that specialises in cold cases. Typical consumer DNA testing kits collect about 750 to 1,000 nanograms of DNA in a sample. These samples are uploaded to public websites specialising in ancestry or health. But crime scenes may only contain tens to hundreds of nanograms of DNA. And in this case, only 0.12 nanograms - or about 15 cells' worth - were available for testing. Using databases like Ancestry.com, the researchers were able to identify the suspect's cousin. Eventually they matched the DNA to Darren Roy Marchand. Marchand's DNA from a previous 1986 murder case was still on record, and was used to confirm the match. He was never convicted and died by suicide in 1995. The genomic technology used to solve the case is the same that was used to catch the notorious Golden State Killer in 2018. "This was a huge milestone," Othram chief executive David Mittelman told the BBC. "When you can access information from such a small amount of DNA, it really opens up the opportunity to so many other cases that have been historically considered cold and unsolvable." The company is currently working on cases dating back as far as 1881

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57947785


obviously the intruder DNA in Jonbenet is more substantial than in this case.

science is about using the same scientific methodology on scientific evidence.


Is there a scientifically compelling reason to regard the DNA as compelling in this case but not applying the same standard and reasoning to the Jonbenet case?

As I told my apprentice,


if you only know the power of the DNA side of the Forensics. Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven




_________________
If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side
redpill
redpill

Posts : 6201
Join date : 2012-12-08

BraveHeart likes this post

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum