A rebuttal to Tricia Griffith's deeply disturbing display of ignorance

View previous topic View next topic Go down

A rebuttal to Tricia Griffith's deeply disturbing display of ignorance

Post by redpill on Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:28 pm

tricia griffth, the owner of websleuths wrote

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?76520-Patsy-Ramsey/page92
tricia griffith wrote:
Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.

No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder.

As owner, I do my best to stay out of actual discussions about a crime.

The JBR case is the one expection.

Websleuths is a leader in true crime information as well as discussion. People come here to get information. It is imperative we deal with the facts. Not fantasy.

All I ask for are facts and a logical connecting of the dots. Logic and facts.

When I get time I will be going through the forum to make sure the JonBenet Ramsey forum is being held up to the high standards just like all our other forums on Websleuths.

The days of allowing anyone to post anything because it's part of their "theory" are gone. Facts and logic. Very simple.

it is highly disturbing that tricia griffith claims

"No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder." and "The JBR case is the one expection." and "All I ask for are facts and a logical connecting of the dots. Logic and facts."

this is coming from a poster who continues to promote the discredited debunked works of Cherokee, who is not a linguist or a handwriting expert, and Cina Wong, who also has been debunked.

re: "

"No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder."

DNA is evidence.

per Mark Beckner
Mark Beckner wrote:

• "The suspect is the donator of that unknown DNA, and until you can prove otherwise, I think that's the way you've got to look at it.

so for someone to say she follows it, and she wants facts and logic and then claim "No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder."  is deeply disturbing. It is contradicted by Mark Beckner head of BPD.

Aynia, BOESP, cynic, Love143, questfortrue are also guilty culprits.

Let's get something clear,

Aynia, BOESP, cynic, Love143, questfortrue and Tricia Griffith decided to insert themselves into the Jonbenet ramsey case. They use the most popular and heavily viewed forum to promote their misinformation and pseudoscience and false claims.
yet not once has anyone actually studied the forensics science nor given it any thought, nor applied it to this case. they do not even understand the forensic evidence in this case. Tricia griffith never rebutted cherokee's claims of forensic linguistics and handwriting, and even applauded it.

that is deeply disturbing display of ignorance.

tricia griffith et al continue to promote fringe non-experts like cina wong, and ignore dna experts and fiber and shoeprint evidence on the most popular website on jonbenet, websleuths.  that is deeply disturbing display of ignorance.

tricia griffith et al including cynic, has never not once ever studied the relevant science in this case, nor the fact including trace evidence. that is deeply disturbing display of ignorance.

the ransom note btw is also evidence of an intruder. so to say there is no scintilla of evidence to show intruder   that is deeply disturbing display of ignorance.

apparently tricia et al do not know what the english word "unsourced" means. that is deeply disturbing display of ignorance.

mary lacy's exoneration letter also cites intruder evidence with facts and logic as well as carnes decision. their failure to appreciate this - that is deeply disturbing display of ignorance.

tricia and her websleuths is intellectually scientifically and morally bankrupt, and her website websleuth and partner form forumsforjustice is the very opposite of justice.


The days of allowing anyone to post anything because it's part of their "theory" are gone. Facts and logic. Very simple.

any theory involving patsy burke or john is a "theory".


Websleuths is a leader in true crime information as well as discussion. People come here to get information. It is imperative we deal with the facts. Not fantasy.

DNA, fiber, ransom note trace evidence, shoe unsourced ligature tape are all facts. promoting debunked experts like cina wong is fantasy.

cynic's rebuttals are fantasy as cynic has never actually studied the relevant forensics at any time in any way ever.

_________________
If you only knew the POWER of the Daubert side
avatar
redpill

Posts : 1479
Join date : 2012-12-08

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum