Shauna Rae Richardson JONBENET Patsy wrote the ransom note vs Power of the Daubert side of the Forensics

Sun Jun 16, 2019 9:28 pm

searchinGirl wrote:Ponder the fatal flaw.... I wish you would comment on my subreddit... promise if you are nice and don’t use any profanity you will not be banned, I’ll work with you...

i headed over to youtube where i found a youtube channel, initially by looking up Lindsay Buziak by Shauna Rae Richardson




her video is

WHAT HAPPENED TO JONBENET RAMSEY?!? Has it already been solved?



Shauna Rae

Published on Feb 23, 2018
As always, with these videos, I try to get the most accurate information possible with the resources that I'm able to use. If you have pieces of information that were left out, please feel free to add them in the comments below.

ref https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpgAHBxdnfw&t=1993s

to clarify the issues,

searchinGirl wrote:Ponder the fatal flaw.... I wish you would comment on my subreddit... promise if you are nice and don’t use any profanity you will not be banned, I’ll work with you...

young Rae




majored in theather and acting, kinda like what David Hughes told me, is RDI, summarizes RDI from reddit websleuth ffj

and is an actress and model turned true crime. i must say i'm kinda impressed with her channel. if she is writing up the crimes it must take her a lot of time.



at 22:00 minutes

young Rae said based on websleuth well some experts said Patsy wrote the ransom note, other experts said it's 2 different writers, she's looked at it and defintely thinks it looks like Patsy's handwriting.


in all these years, all the posters at websleuth, forumsforjustice and reddit, and not a single poster mentions this

what i call the Daubert side of the Forensics


this is statement of Daubert Side of the Forensics

The Court defined "scientific methodology" as the process of formulating hypotheses and then conducting experiments to prove or falsify the hypothesis, and provided a set of illustrative factors (i.e., not a "test") in determining whether these criteria are met:

Whether the theory or technique employed by the expert is generally accepted in the scientific community;
Whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication;
Whether it can be and has been tested;
Whether the known or potential rate of error is acceptable; and
Whether the research was conducted independent of the particular litigation or dependent on an intention to provide the proposed testimony.[4]

which experts are qualified under Daubert and what is their expert witness testimony.


are the experts that state Patsy wrote the ransom note qualified under Daubert?

are the experts that state Patsy is eliminated as author of the ransom note qualified under Daubert?

how do you know?

under Daubert, how do experts assess this scale?

does applying the power of the Daubert side of the Forensics lead to RDI or intruder theorists?

you will find the fog of lies the RDI have created


RDI

Yes RDI is in pretty deep shit.

searchinGirl wrote:Yes RDI is in pretty deep shit.

wow i'm kinda happy you're back.

genetic geneology will spell the end, i suspect one day you'll hear that an arrest has been made to a suspect who is a 100% match to the DNA, and was identified same exact way as 20-year-old Darlene Krashoc Colorado Springs cold case

notice only me is talking about daubert and FDE's and cases solved via touch dna on clothing and genetic geneology.

only the cutting edge of forensics here

You just gotta believe they haven’t given up trying.

Playing golf in the morning. First time since the broken arm. League started six weeks ago. I’m apprehensive.

searchinGirl wrote:You just gotta believe they haven’t given up trying.

Playing golf in the morning. First time since the broken arm. League started six weeks ago. I’m apprehensive.

in the 20-year-old Darlene Krashoc Colorado Springs did anyone realize they are using genetic geneology? i suspect they are doing it with JBR

btw i just critque delmar england trace evidence