possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory

by redpill Sun Aug 29, 2021 6:43 pm

Sun Aug 29, 2021 6:33 pm

I found this,

CONTINUING QUESTIONS

Yet, this was far from the end for the family, and the DNA evidence wouldn't be as clear-cut as might immediately be imagined. Being a mere speck, the possibility exists that the DNA may have been transferred through nonsuspicious means, with Gordon Coombes, a former investigator for the Boulder County District Attorney's office telling the New York Post in 2016 that "[DNA] can be deposited anywhere at any time for various reasons, reasons that are benign. To clear somebody just on the premise of touch DNA, especially when you have a situation where the crime scene wasn't secure at the beginning ... really is a stretch."

Additionally, there were additional samples of male DNA on the garrote, with six different examples found belonging to unknown individuals. With the crime scene open to anyone in the initial stages, it's likely some came through police failings. However, the same DNA from the underwear was found elsewhere around the body. It was under the fingernails, under the waistband of the victim's leggings, on the wrist bindings and on the garrote.

ref https://www.frontpagedetectives.com/p/jonbenet-ramsey-police-investigate-colorado

of interest to us,

However, the same DNA from the underwear was found elsewhere around the body. It was under the fingernails, under the waistband of the victim's leggings, on the wrist bindings and on the garrote

if these claims are true, basically this clinches the case the DNA evidence for intruder theory

however, he doesn't have a reference from an official source.

originally the most salient DNA evidence in 1997 was

DNA from the underwear

Mary Lacy report in 2008

under the waistband of the victim's leggings

was from Bode Technology

there was a new round of DNA testing done in 2018 as reported in Camera and Daily Boulder from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation

if the results were indeed

It was under the fingernails, under the waistband of the victim's leggings, on the wrist bindings and on the garrote

obviously that's compelling evidence of an intruder.

but there's no reference if this is indeed the latest result of the latest 2018 DNA testing from CBI

from the earliest days of JBR the RDI claim was the fingernail DNA was "contaminated" and "degraded" since the coroner didn't use a new sterile scissor/nail clipper in collecting the under the fingernail DNA, so it was claimed.

here finding DNA both under the fingernails and the actual murder weapons if true refutes RDI.

genetic genealogy can of course attempt to find relatives of this DNA, if CODIS is unable to do so.

affraid

by BraveHeart Mon Aug 30, 2021 8:31 pm

Redpill, it looks to me like the writer just combined these three statements to get leggings waistband, underwear, fingernails, wrist bindings and garotte. Yet, seems like enough samples to eliminate some people...more than just a minute single sample not known to be crime-related as Beckner protested.

by redpill Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:18 pm

BraveHeart wrote:Redpill, it looks to me like the writer just combined these three statements to get leggings waistband, underwear, fingernails, wrist bindings and garotte. Yet, seems like enough samples to eliminate some people...more than just a minute single sample not known to be crime-related as Beckner protested.

what statements mentioned ", wrist bindings and garotte"?

thanks bounce

by BraveHeart Tue Aug 31, 2021 4:13 pm

From the 2018 dna testing?
"It was under the fingernails, under the waistband of the victim's leggings, on the wrist bindings and on the garrote"

by redpill Tue Aug 31, 2021 5:26 pm

BraveHeart wrote:From the 2018 dna testing?
"It was under the fingernails, under the waistband of the victim's leggings, on the wrist bindings and on the garrote"

hi,

can you provide a link ?

thanks

by BraveHeart Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:36 pm

I thought you were quoting the results of the 2018 testing. Apparently not.

by redpill Sat Sep 04, 2021 12:05 am

BraveHeart wrote:I thought you were quoting the results of the 2018 testing. Apparently not.

I was quoting

ref https://www.frontpagedetectives.com/p/jonbenet-ramsey-police-investigate-colorado

but he's not listed his source

2018 testing did testing on those items

Boulder DA: New round of Ramsey DNA tests completed, more could follow

ref https://www.dailycamera.com/2018/06/29/boulder-da-new-round-of-ramsey-dna-tests-completed-more-could-follow/

by Sponsored content

possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory

possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory

Re: possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory

Re: possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory

Re: possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory

Re: possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory

Re: possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory

Re: possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory

Re: possible new DNA evidence reported in The Unsolved Murder of JonBenet Ramsey for intruder theory