Mr. Cruel intruder JonBenet Ramsey and falsifiable scientific forensic prediction

this is Mr Cruel






this is Jonbenet Ramsey


pictures of Jonbenet



My Mr. Cruel intruder JonBenet Ramsey theory makes a specific set of predictions that can be falsified

there are 2 time periods under consideration

in the first, in Dec 26 1996

My Mr. Cruel intruder JonBenet Ramsey theory predicts Mr Cruel owned white nylon cord identical to that found on JonBenet Ramsey, electrical tape identical to that found on JonBenet Ramsey, brown cotton gloves, handwriting and linguistics identical to the ransom note, adult hi-tech boots identical to that found in the Jonbenet Ramsey basement, he had some sort of weapon that can bash Jonbenet's skull, he had fibers and hair from contact with Jonbenet, he carried out missing items such as missing piece of the paintbrush used in the garrotte. he enaged in sexual activity with Jonbenet, resulting in the presence of foreign material in Jonbenet's vagina and bleeding and injury.

my theory requires Mr Cruel flies in from Australia to USA

in 2017

now many of the above items can easily be disposed of and replaced.

but there are at least 2 forensic predictions

the first prediction is DNA

as was widely reported they found 3 samples of the same DNA on 2 separate articles of clothing.

My theory predicts that DNA should match DNA taken from Mr. Cruel,

or, alternatively,

any DNA taken from Mr Cruel's known crime scene should match the DNA found on Jonbenet's clothing

The taskforce established that Mr Cruel was almost certainly responsible for an earlier series of attacks in Melbourne’s southern suburbs in the early to mid-1980s.

Spectrum detectives wanted to review all the evidence from those cases. They were bitterly disappointed to find some of the evidence had been lost.

Of particular concern was the fact that tape Mr Cruel had used to bind one of his victims was missing.

There have been vast improvements in forensic technology since those attacks in the 1980s, enabling scientists to extract identifying characteristics from the smallest of samples left by an offender.

Mr Cruel’s DNA may well have been on that tape as it is likely he was not as careful during those early attacks as he was with his later victims.

“But we will never know as the exhibit just isn’t there anymore,” the then Commander Sprague told the Herald Sun in 2003.

“In those days police didn’t have the supervision that they do now. With things like exhibits, people would sometimes leave them in their lockers.

“By the time we identified these additional attacks, years after they had taken place, some of those exhibits had been lost and others had simply been thrown out.

“They had never been examined. One exhibit that was lost was tape that one of the victims had been tied up in.

“There were other examples of exhibits that might have been vital to us in identifying the offender not being able to be located when we asked for them.
Detectives believe Mr Cruel may have killed Karmein after she saw his face.

ref Victoria Police and FBI dossier on shocking Mr Cruel child attacks
Keith Moor, Herald Sun


My theory predicts the DNA found on Jonbenet's clothing should match "Mr Cruel’s DNA may well have been on that tape as it is likely he was not as careful during those early attacks as he was with his later victims." if they can find missing electrical tape, and get a good DNA profile

Finding the same DNA profile at Jonbenet clothing and Mr Cruel's known crime scenes would be very strong forensic evidence my theory is correct that Mr Cruel is responsible for both such attacks.

Sadly Aussies lost all such DNA-testable items.

Second prediction is if Mr Cruel is still alive, he most likely has in collection home made pornography consisting of his former victims AND Jonbenet Ramsey.

In his private home made collection of   porn includes the very last photos of Jonbenet before she was murdered taken at the Ramsey home on Dec 26, 1996.

Suppose Australians arrest an elderly man in 2017, for child porn charges. In his  porn collection are photos of clearly Jonbenet Ramsey with a pink barbie night gown and other items, taken inside her home, at age 6, as well as  porn photos of Eloise Worledge Karmein Chan Nicola Lynas Sharon wills etc.

That would be confirmation of a major prediction of my Mr Cruel Jonbenet intruder theory.

RDI theories also make scientific predictions, which have been falsified, but that's a story for another day

But yes, the Mr Cruel intruder Jonbenet theory makes genuine scientific predictions that can be verified or falsified.

Unfortunately Mr Cruel has never been identified and evidence that could be tested for DNA such as electrical tape Mr Cruel put on his victim mouth and eyes have been lost.

But if they can get DNA that is indisputably Mr Cruel's and if it doesn't match the DNA found on Jonbenet clothing, then my theory is falsified


Another implication of my theory is that Taskforce Spectrum can round up all Mr. Cruel suspects and test their DNA. My theory predicts that if one of the suspects is indeed Mr. Cruel at least 1 of them will match the DNA found on Jonbenet's longjohns and panties distal stain -007

note DA's office announced that in 2017 newer DNA testing will be done on all items of the crime scene.

 

Unless Mr. Cruel walked around with his face covered all the time then someone has seen it and just not knows his name or who they are looking at. Unless Mr. Cruel is a total hermit he has interacted with people and those just don't know it or he used another assumed name. Mr. Cruel would have had to buy food and live somewhere and would need money; unless of course he is rich. Mr. Cruel has a name and someone knows it they just haven't found the person who can identify him. Mr. Cruel can't be careful about DNA all the time so there is some of it around; although not a good sample. Just me stating the obvious. Your theory holds up if a elderly man is found with any of the items missing from the Ramsey house, i.e. part of missing paintbrush, nylon cord, tape, and picture of JonBenet the night she died.

I agree that your Mr. Cruel theory wouldn't hold any water if his DNA was collected tested and it was not a match for the DNA found in JonBenet Ramsey.

yeah but could be another australian guy

the DA announced they are re-testing the jonbenet crime scene with newer DNA techniques that didn't exist in 2006 and 1998, and includes the ligature

james kolar claims there are 6 distinct dna profiles.

in another case we have photos of the killer and voice but no name


Abigail Williams and Liberty German,





this guy

True. It is too bad that the authorities couldn't have rounded up Australian men put them in a line-up and had them say the things Mr. Cruel said and have his living victims listen. Perhaps one of them would have been able to make a voice identification. I watched a fiction movie where that a kidnapped teen identified her kidnapper by his voice when she heard it after she was rescued. If Mr. Cruel is ever caught then he can be identified by his voice unless it was disguised. I hope more of that DNA shows up and matches the DNA found already then they can have a better chance of finding her killer.

MurderMysteryReader wrote:True. It is too bad that the authorities couldn't have rounded up Australian men put them in a line-up and had them say the things Mr. Cruel said and have his living victims listen. Perhaps one of them would have been able to make a voice identification. I watched a fiction movie where that a kidnapped teen identified her kidnapper by his voice when she heard it after she was rescued. If Mr. Cruel is ever caught then he can be identified by his voice unless it was disguised. I hope more of that DNA shows up and matches the DNA found already then they can have a better chance of finding her killer.

here's an interesting idea

imagine that they were able to locate the missing electrical tape Mr Cruel used on his victim

they test the DNA on it and it matches the DNA found on Jonbenet Ramsey clothing as referenced by Mary Lacy

what do you think all the RDI posters on all the RDI forums will say? esp the RDI posters on reddit r/jonbenet who complained to the admin and asked i get banned?

What the RDI always do when confronted with evidence that contradicts the Ramseys doing it; deny it, doubt it and call it irrelevant. They only want to hear about evidence that proves the guilt of the Ramsey's. That is why your Mr. Cruel theory got you banned, because you presented a theory that was opposite of RDI.